Page 14 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 12(1) (2024)
P. 14

Introduction                                been uncovered slowly and painstakingly, a pro-
                                                           cess that is far from complete. In recent times,
                       sor, one of the most prominent plac-  the  picture has radically  changed,  especially
                       es in the Kvarner region and the saf-
               Oest city on the eastern Adriatic coast     with the implementation of systematic and res-
               in ancient times, is situated on a low isthmus   cue archaeological excavations (Baričević n.d.;
               at the meeting point of what was once the uni-  Čaušević-Bully et al. 2017; Los 2018; Bully et al.
                                                           2024) and extensive scientific research projects
               fied island of Cres-Lošinj. Through tradition   (Doneus and Blečić Kavur 2023; Blečić Kavur
               and mythic past, this northernmost Adriatic ar-  et al. 2024; Fera et al. 2024). These efforts have
               chipelago is clearly defined in geographical and   provided not only new spatial data and re-eval-
               epic literature as Aspirtides (Apsýrtides Nêsoi or   uations of existing or enigmatic archaeological
               Osor Islands), with the central settlement called   structures but also essential contexts that offer
               Apsor (Apsoros or Osor), and its inhabitants re-
        14     ferred to as Apsirtes or Apsirtians. In front of   valuable insights for reinterpreting the material
               the  Aspirtides lay the  Histrian,  and later,  the   culture within the broader cultural and histori-
                                                           cal circumstances of the time. This study focus-
        studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 12 (2024), številka 1 / volume 12 (2024), number 1
               Liburnian coast with its islands. The origins of   es on a comprehensive analysis of burial practices
               these names are deeply rooted in legendary his-  during the Bronze and Iron Ages, as necropoles
               tory, and many writers (and copyists) in antiq-  and graves provide the largest collection of pre-
               uity  connect  them to Greek  mythology, inter-  served artefacts.
               preting them through the legend of the famous   The concept of the archaeology of death, in
               Greek sailors, the Argonauts, and their quest   connection with previous research in the Osor
               for the Golden Fleece (Katičić 1995, 184–187; cf.   area, is introduced. This is followed by a topo-
               Mori 2008; Blečić Kavur 2015, 15–18). The im-  graphical review and chronological ordering of
               portance of both the place and the broader re-  grave locations, along with their contextualiza-
               gion is emphasized by the phrase ‘Tin Islands’,   tion  in  relation  to  burial  practices  both  with-
               used by several sources to describe the Cres-  in and  outside the urban area. Published and
               Lošinj archipelago with Osor, located near the   known data, as well as previously unknown or
               Histrian coast (Imamović 1972; Kozličić 1990,   less accessible information, are analysed to cre-
               150–151). Although tin is not naturally found in   ate, as much as possible, a comprehensive under-
               this area, the name likely metaphorically refers   standing of this crucial social and cultural as-
               to a trading hub involved in the redistribution of   pect of life in Osor. The concluding discussion
               bronze and bronze objects, along with the cru-  interprets the current state of knowledge about
               cial tin needed for bronze production (Blečić   ‘death in Osor’ and highlights the importance of
               Kavur 2014a, 161).                          archival research and the results of new system-
                   Despite existing studies, primarily focused   atic investigations, which, with each new effort,
               on the material culture of this period, the last   confirm the prominence and status of this place
               prehistoric millennium in Osor has not been   in the last millennium BCE.
               extensively written about from other perspec-
               tives, especially considering the city's vital role in   Archaeology of Death and Excavations
               the region. This is partly due to insufficient re-  in Osor
               search over the past century and the lack or in-  The historic area of Osor, along with nearby Pun-
               accessibility of documentation from early cam-  ta Križa, stands out as a distinct, geographically
               paigns of investigation. Despite the efforts of   well-defined environment at the southernmost
               individual scholars (Benndorf 1880; Klodič 1885;   tip of the island of Cres (fig. 1). The Lošinj Chan-
               Marchesetti 1924; Mladin 1960; Faber 1980;   nel connects it directly with Kvarnerić and the
               Glogović 1989), this part of Osor's history has   Lošinj archipelago, which in turn links to the
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19