Page 322 - Lazar, Irena, Aleksander Panjek in Jonatan Vinkler. Ur. 2020. Mikro in makro. Pristopi in prispevki k humanističnim vedam ob dvajsetletnici UP Fakultete za humanistične študije, 2. knjiga. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem.
P. 322
arke, L. 1996. “Logic, Art and Argument.” Informal logic 18: 105–29.
Groarke, L. 2002. “Towards a Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument.” In
Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, 137–51.
Amsterdam; Newport News, VA: Sic Sat and Vale Press.
Groarke, L. 2009. “Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” In
Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, edited by F. H. van Eemeren
and B. Garssen, 229–39. Amsterdam: Springer.
Groarke, L. 2013a. “On Dove, Visual Evidence and Verbal Repackaging.” In
Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference
of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May
2013, edited by D. Mohammed and M. Lewin´ski, 1–8. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Groarke, L. 2013b. “The Elements of Argument: Six Steps to a Thick Theory.”
In What Do We Know about the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative
Perspectives, edited by G. Kišiček and I. Ž. Žagar, 25–43. Ljubljana: Educational
Research Institute
Groarke, L. 2015. “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why
Does It Matter?” Argumentation 29 (2): 133–55.
Groarke L., C. H. Palczewski, and D. Godden 2016. “Navigating the Visual
Turn in Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 217–35.
Johnson, R. H. 2003. “Why ‘Visual Arguments’ Aren’t Arguments.” In
Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference, edited by H.
V. Hansen, Ch. W. Tindale, A. Blair, and R. H. Johnson, 1–13. Windsor,
ON: University of Windsor.
Johnson, R. H. 2010. “On the Evaluation of Visual Arguments: Roque and
the Autonomy Thesis.” Paper, presented at Persuasion et argumentation:
Colloque international organisé par le CRAL à l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes
en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 7–9 September 2010.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric – From Elocutio to Convention.” In
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International
Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, R.
Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard, 455–60. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2007. “Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political
Advertising: A Cognitive, Contextual, and Reception-Oriented
Approach.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–32.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2012. “Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes
and Figures as a Way of Creating Visual Argumentation.” In Topical
Themes in Argumentation Theory, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and B.
Garssen, 239–56. Amsterdam: Springer.
698
Groarke, L. 2002. “Towards a Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument.” In
Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, 137–51.
Amsterdam; Newport News, VA: Sic Sat and Vale Press.
Groarke, L. 2009. “Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” In
Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, edited by F. H. van Eemeren
and B. Garssen, 229–39. Amsterdam: Springer.
Groarke, L. 2013a. “On Dove, Visual Evidence and Verbal Repackaging.” In
Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference
of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May
2013, edited by D. Mohammed and M. Lewin´ski, 1–8. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Groarke, L. 2013b. “The Elements of Argument: Six Steps to a Thick Theory.”
In What Do We Know about the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative
Perspectives, edited by G. Kišiček and I. Ž. Žagar, 25–43. Ljubljana: Educational
Research Institute
Groarke, L. 2015. “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why
Does It Matter?” Argumentation 29 (2): 133–55.
Groarke L., C. H. Palczewski, and D. Godden 2016. “Navigating the Visual
Turn in Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 52 (4): 217–35.
Johnson, R. H. 2003. “Why ‘Visual Arguments’ Aren’t Arguments.” In
Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference, edited by H.
V. Hansen, Ch. W. Tindale, A. Blair, and R. H. Johnson, 1–13. Windsor,
ON: University of Windsor.
Johnson, R. H. 2010. “On the Evaluation of Visual Arguments: Roque and
the Autonomy Thesis.” Paper, presented at Persuasion et argumentation:
Colloque international organisé par le CRAL à l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes
en Sciences Sociales, Paris, 7–9 September 2010.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric – From Elocutio to Convention.” In
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International
Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, R.
Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard, 455–60. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2007. “Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political
Advertising: A Cognitive, Contextual, and Reception-Oriented
Approach.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–32.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2012. “Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes
and Figures as a Way of Creating Visual Argumentation.” In Topical
Themes in Argumentation Theory, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and B.
Garssen, 239–56. Amsterdam: Springer.
698
