Page 323 - Lazar, Irena, Aleksander Panjek in Jonatan Vinkler. Ur. 2020. Mikro in makro. Pristopi in prispevki k humanističnim vedam ob dvajsetletnici UP Fakultete za humanistične študije, 2. knjiga. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem.
P. 323
reasoning and representation in “visual argumentation”
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2013. “Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow
Presentations: The Role of Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate
Change.” Argumentation 27 (4): 425–43.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2015a. “The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures
Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.”
Argumentation 29 (2): 197–215.
Kjeldsen J. E. 2015b. “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.”
Argumentation 29 (2): 115–32.
Kišiček, G., and I. Ž. Žagar, eds. 2013. What Do We Know about the World?
Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives. Ljubljana: Educational
Research Institute
Patterson, S. W. 2010. “A Picture Held Us Captive: The Later Wittgenstein on
Visual Argumentation.” Cogency 2 (2): 105–34.
Roque, G. 2010. “What Is Visual in Visual Argumentation?” In Argument
Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, edited by J. Ritola et al., 1–9. Windsor,
ON: OSSA.
Roque, G. 2012. “Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal.” In Topical
Themes in Argumentation Theory, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and B.
Garssen, 273–88. Amsterdam: Springer.
Roque, G. 2015. “Should Visual Arguments Be Propositional in Order to Be
Arguments?” Argumentation 29 (2): 177–95.
Žagar, I. Ž. 2016. “Against Visual Argumentation: Multimodality as
Composite Meaning and Composite Utterances.” In Argumentation and
Reasoned Action. Volume I: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference
on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Studies in Logic, vol. 62, edited by D.
Mohammed and M. Lewiński, 829–52. London: College Publications.
Žagar, I. Ž. 2018. “Perception, Inference, and Understanding in Visual
Argumentation (and Beyond).” In Argumentation and Inference. Volume
I: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg
2017, Studies in Logic and Argumentation, vol. 77, edited by S. Oswald and
D. Maillat, 439–69. London: College Publications.
Web sources
Acta Plantarum. 463. http://www.actaplantarum.org/acta/galleria1.
php?aid=463.
Commons. Maclura 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maclura_
pomifera_Inermis_BotGardBln1105Fruits.jpg.
699
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2013. “Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow
Presentations: The Role of Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate
Change.” Argumentation 27 (4): 425–43.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2015a. “The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures
Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.”
Argumentation 29 (2): 197–215.
Kjeldsen J. E. 2015b. “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.”
Argumentation 29 (2): 115–32.
Kišiček, G., and I. Ž. Žagar, eds. 2013. What Do We Know about the World?
Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives. Ljubljana: Educational
Research Institute
Patterson, S. W. 2010. “A Picture Held Us Captive: The Later Wittgenstein on
Visual Argumentation.” Cogency 2 (2): 105–34.
Roque, G. 2010. “What Is Visual in Visual Argumentation?” In Argument
Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, edited by J. Ritola et al., 1–9. Windsor,
ON: OSSA.
Roque, G. 2012. “Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal.” In Topical
Themes in Argumentation Theory, edited by F. H. van Eemeren and B.
Garssen, 273–88. Amsterdam: Springer.
Roque, G. 2015. “Should Visual Arguments Be Propositional in Order to Be
Arguments?” Argumentation 29 (2): 177–95.
Žagar, I. Ž. 2016. “Against Visual Argumentation: Multimodality as
Composite Meaning and Composite Utterances.” In Argumentation and
Reasoned Action. Volume I: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference
on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, Studies in Logic, vol. 62, edited by D.
Mohammed and M. Lewiński, 829–52. London: College Publications.
Žagar, I. Ž. 2018. “Perception, Inference, and Understanding in Visual
Argumentation (and Beyond).” In Argumentation and Inference. Volume
I: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg
2017, Studies in Logic and Argumentation, vol. 77, edited by S. Oswald and
D. Maillat, 439–69. London: College Publications.
Web sources
Acta Plantarum. 463. http://www.actaplantarum.org/acta/galleria1.
php?aid=463.
Commons. Maclura 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maclura_
pomifera_Inermis_BotGardBln1105Fruits.jpg.
699
