Page 69 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol. 3(1) (2015). Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem/University of Primorska Press.
P. 69
ia universitatisas an ideal product mix between the coastal and Figure 7: Tourist arrivals (blue) and overnights (red) with
6 | m. koščak – the challenges for sustainable tour ism development ... 69 the rural elements, which may be seen as sus- trends, Source RRC Koper, 2015.
tainable in the longer term perspective. Further-
more, such a plan will have the intrinsic capacity This figure shows, and we can interpret it as
in helping to revitalise the rural part of Slovene such, that the traditional sun, sea and sand prod-
Istria, which to a degree has suffered from a lev- uct (3S), is not in trend anymore and that its life
el of peripherality from the more intensive tour- cycle is declining. Unfortunately it was a lost op-
istic development of the coastal region. The portunity to launch a Heritage Trail and to fo-
main aim of the project was therefore to stim- cus more on the rural offer some years ago when
ulate tourism development in the hinterland of the opportunity was ripe for such actions. It is
the Slovene coast. This aim should be pursued not our intention to speculate and insist that
by offering support to rural business initiatives, this will change the figures presented above,
by improving the infrastructure and by intensive but we believe that a Heritage Trail type struc-
marketing activity with focus on rural hinter- ture would open immense opportunities for ru-
land of Slovene Istria. ral entrepreneurs and offer them new challenges
for new jobs in their home-yards in rural Istria.
Stages of Commercial Product Certainly the evidence presented in Case Study
Adaptation and Implementation 1, shows how such a potential can reach a realis-
tic and achievable end.
For a change from Heritage Trails in Dolenjska
and Bela krajina, Heritage Trails in Slovenia Is- Tourism Destination and DMO
tria was, sadly, never officially launched, neither – Challenge No. 2 for S Primorska?
on the domestic nor on the international mar-
ket. The reason for this failure lay in the fact that A tourist destination is defined as a “geograp-
tourist stakeholders in this coastal region, whi- hical area, territorial-administrative unit or an
ch was traditionally and remains now the most important attraction that is trying to offer its
visited tourism region in Slovenia, were fixa- visitors experiences which can range from accep-
ted in the past achievements of tourism activi- table to unforgettable.”1 From a conceptual point
ty. As a result, in the current contemporary en- of view, that is if we take into consideration the
vironment, which holds greater challenges and manageability of a destination, it is far more ef-
demands, they have been unable and to a de- ficient to regard a destination as a geographical
gree unwilling to make that critical step forward region that has its necessary critical mass or as
to co-operate, to engage and to agree an effici- a cluster attraction, so that the destination can
ent and long-term public-private partnership &
co-operation, which will perform as Destinati- 1 Bornhorst, T., Ritchie, J.R.B., Sheehan, L., “Determinants of touri-
on Management Organisation (DMO). Such a sm success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination
DMO would and should act on behalf of all tou- of stakeholders’ perspectives“, Tourism Managment, Article in Press,
rist stakeholders in the region and by the synergi- July, 2009, 1.
es thus created dynamise the entire tourism offer
for this region. Regrettably, such an organisation
does not exist in this region of Slovenia and un-
fortunately it is the only Slovenian tourism regi-
on which is without such an important capacity.
This is kind of paradox, but on the other side a
painful reality which already reflects in some to-
urism figures and statistics (see below).
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74