Page 111 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 12(1) (2024)
P. 111

These developments were possible part-  mals as hosts of tsetse and trypanosomes and ex-
               ly as a result of the nineteenth century medi-  tensive bush clearing (Adu-Gyamfi and Donkoh
               cal revolution, which basically dealt with inves-  2013). Preventive measures that were implement-
               tigations into scientific causes of diseases (King   ed  within  the  period  include  eradicating  the
               1960). These developments changed the sleeping   tsetse fly in certain areas, most notably the de-
               sickness therapy and its associated theories that   struction of their habitat. Again, another strat-
               had thus far proven ineffective (Coghe 2017).   egy employed within the period was the reloca-
               In contrast, Ford’s (1971) study of the tsetse fly   tion of people. Often, it was the relocation of the
               problem in Africa argued that wider develop-  entire population or a whole village from tsetse
               ments or progress was the answer to the tsetse   fly zones (Coghe 2017). Notwithstanding the ex-
               fly question, while not overlooking the fact that   isting research on trypanosomiasis, the African
               pre-colonial indigenous systems were also high-  population  attributed  the disease to  supernat-
               ly effective. This was partly due to the fact that   ural causes (Cunningham et al. 2016).  To em-  111
               trypanosomiasis had long existed on the conti-  phasize, the indigenous population attributed
               nent and hence, the indigenous population had   the scourge of the disease to the offences the lo-
               developed traditional strategies to combat the   cal population had committed against the gods.
               disease. Similarly, in an article “Trypanosomi-  Sometimes it was also attributed to a purport-
               asis Control in African History: An Evaded is-  ed misdemeanour they had committed against
               sue”, Giblin (1990) referred to Ford concerning   their ancestors. This was due to the fact that the
               the fact that pre-colonial African societies suc-  Asante, explained diseases within the social con-
               cessfully co-existed with trypanosomiasis. Ford   text of health hence, the social causation ele-
               (1971) has again lamented that the early coloni-  ment suffices as the cause for such explanations.
               al epidemics of trypanosomiasis was a direct re-  The above discourse also proves that the trypa-
               sult of changing ecological dynamics influenced   nosomiasis question has persisted over a centu-
               by colonial conquest as well as the pattern of re-  ry and cannot be defined or attributed to a re-
               covery following the rinderpest (infectious viral   cent phenomenon.
               disease of cattle). However, in their research “A   Adu Gyamfi (2010) and Adu-Gyamfi, Osei-
               Historical Review of Diseases and Disease Pre-  Wusu, and Owusu Ansah (2013) paid attention
               vention in the Gold Coast; A Focus on Asante”,   to broader studies which captured aspects of the
               Adu-Gyamfi and Donkoh argued that trypano-  fight against  trypanosomiasis  in  Ghana.  Gri- Indigenous and European Policies and Strategies for Combatting Asante Trypanosomiasis
               somiasis existed in sub-Saharan Africa long be-  schow (2006) also did some general studies on
               fore 1903. However, when the vector was identi-  trypanosomiasis in Ghana. The above notwith-
               fied in Asante, they raised arguments concerning   standing, there is still the need to re-interrogate
               the limited knowledge of the local population   the nature of the disease and the type of indig-
               concerning  the  disease.  This  resulted  in  sever-  enous responses that came from Asante. In par-
               al fatalities within the period until 1905 when a   ticular, within the twentieth century, the nature
               survey research was done to ascertain the cause   of the relationship between the British Coloni-
               of the outbreak.                            al Administration and Asante traditional au-
                   Following a series of research committees   thority, as well as the effort of the indigenous
               and scientific surveys, the vectors and the caus-  population to prevent and combat the trypa-
               ative agents were recognized and this was fol-  nosomiasis scourge, has not been fully explicat-
               lowed by practical measures that were put in   ed. This needs further interpretation especially
               place to combat the disease. These included the   within the framework of the impact of ill health
               use of the first arsenical compounds to treat   on the socio-economic space of the people of
               the disease, resettlement of the exposed popu-  Ghana and Asante in particular. The current
               lation, an attempt to eliminate wild game ani-  contribution is guided by the following ques-
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116