Page 81 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(2) (2025)
P. 81

tive appropriation and active reinterpretation in   onally between Histrian Nesactium and Libur-
               the second half of the 9th and early 8th centuries   nian Nin. Its archaeological heritage is therefore
               BCE, whereby imported items and formal con-  crucial for understanding regional and supra-re-
               cepts were integrated into the local aesthetic and   gional social and cultural processes in the Adri-
               symbolic system. Such combinations – for ex-  atic landscape during the rise of the last prehis-
               ample, the pairing of typologically distinct fib-  toric millennium.
               ulae, amber, and glass – indicate the existence of
               prescribed visual codes and socially recognisable   Acknowledgements
               dress compositions. These did not merely reflect   Zrinka Ettinger Starčić (Lošinj Museum, Mali
               economic activity or material value but also the   Lošinj),  Maja  Čuka  (Archaeological  Museum  of
               social control of the symbolic meanings of jewel-  Istria, Pula), Morana Čaušević-Bully (University
               lery, particularly in the context of female identi-  of Franche-Comté – UMR Chrono-Environne-
               ty and status.                              ment), and Dženi Los (Kaducej, Zagreb) enabled   81
                   In the Osor graves, however, ceramic vessels   me to study, process, and publish the material cul-
               are absent, although their fragments are found   ture from both earlier and recent investigations of
               around the graves at all necropolises. This clear-  the Osor burials. Specialised analyses of the osteo-
               ly reflects the rites performed during and after   logical remains, as well as of the geochemical com-
               the burials, including post-mortem vessel-break-  position and isotopic signatures of bronze and am-
               ing ceremonies, as observed in the graves at Sv.   ber, were carried out by Mario Novak (Institute
               Marija, Sv. Katarina, and Mala Prepoved, as well   for Anthropological Research, Zagreb), Wayne
               as the deliberate destruction – or ritualisation –   Powell  (Brooklyn  College  of  CUNY),  Mate-
               of objects at the ceremonial cremation sites on   usz Cwaliński (University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk),
               Kavanela, which were undoubtedly accompa-   and Dorota Wojewódka (Museum of Amber,
               nied by funerary festivities (Mladin 1960; Blečić   Gdańsk). Drawings were prepared by Monika Pe-
               Kavur and Kavur 2024, 21).                  trović (Archaeological Museum of Istria, Pula)
                   In synthesis, the new data significantly en-  and Valeria Medić (Zagreb). Endless discussions
               hance our understanding of Osor’s archaeology   and constructive critiques were once again gene-
               of death and its representative material culture,   rously provided by my Boris Kavur (University of
                                                           Primorska, Koper). The valuable comments of the
               portraying the Osor community as a devel-   two reviewers significantly improved the text. I  The Emergence of the Iron Age in Osor Through Representative Material Culture
               oped and hierarchically organised society with   extend my sincere thanks to all of you.
               clearly defined practices and traditions. The re-  The author acknowledges financial sup-
               sults of integrated interdisciplinary approach-  port from the Slovenian Research and Innova-
               es, which continue to be applied, enable Osor’s   tion Agency for the Osor beyond the myth (N6-
               graves to be understood not merely as a collec-  0292) and From Sea to Sea (N6-0297) projects.
               tion of valuable finds, nor the material culture
               simply as a passive or one-dimensional reflec-  Catalogue of Graves
               tion of daily life, but as an active and inclusive
               medium of identity, ideology, and social memo-  Preko Mosta
               ry. Through this perspective, contacts and con-  During infrastructure works in 2018, part of the
               nections with the Adriatic and broader Europe-  necropolis on the Lošinj side of Kavanela was
               an spheres – particularly in the procurement of   excavated.
               diverse raw materials – become apparent. With-  Grave 8: Extremely poorly preserved small
               in this framework, Osor is confirmed as a princi-  bones and cranial remains were placed on an
               pal island centre and an interpretative model of   earthen substrate covering a small-levelled pla-
               a regional hub, both in vertical and horizontal   teau of bedrock. Near the grave, two small amor-
               connections across the Kvarner, as well as diag-  phous ceramic fragments were found.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86