Page 141 - Blečić Kavur, Martina. Povezanost perspektive / A coherence of perspective. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem, 2015.
P. 141
a, grobnica I/12258 i grobnica 1981., br. 70259 tako i iz Este situlae, these lids are widely dated to the end of the povezanost ... ■ a coherence ... 141
Magdalenske gore, i to tri primjerka poznata iz groba 5th and the 4th cent. BC.
2/46.260 Sukladno estenskim situlama i ti su poklopci
široko datirani u kraj 5. i u 4. st. pr. Kr. The evoked atmosphere should now be understood
also for the situla heritage from Osor which final-
Dočarani ambijent valja sada razumijevati i za situlsku ly prove that the prestigious goods were imported
baštinu, tj. njezine preostale »tragove« iz Osora koji during the end of the 5th and in the 4th cent. BC, as it
nepobitno svjedoče da se prestižna roba uvozila i u to was already proven with the examples from Nesactium
vrijeme kraja 5. i tijekom 4. st. pr. Kr., kako je to već do- (Fig. 51).261
kazano i na nezakcijskim primjercima (sl. 51).261
Beside luxury situlae, bronze fragments of different
Pored luksuznih situla, brončani ulomci različitih shapes demonstrate that in Osor were used also other
oblika svjedoče da su se u Osoru koristile i druge sim- symposium vessels. Two smaller fragments of densely
pozijastičke posude. Dva manja ulomka gusto nare- ribbed bronze sheet, with a lover and rounded profila-
brenog lima, snižene i naglašeno zaobljene profilacije, tion demonstrate that this was most probably a lid of
upozoravaju da su možda služila kao poklopci bronča- a bronze ciborium (Fig. 50A). It was a ritual vessel used
nim ciborijima (sl. 50A). Riječ je o kultnim posudama for sacrifice and which original forms were recorded
za žrtvovanja čije i izvorne forme imamo zabilježene in the monuments of Situla Art. Their lids are usually
u umjetnosti situlskih spomenika. Njihovi poklopci densely ribbed and lowered – a form exclusively repre-
su najčešće gusto narebreni, snižene profilacije što ek- sented by the figural decorated ciborium from Magda-
skluzivno predstavlja figuralno ukrašen ciborij iz Mag- lenska gora.262 Such vessels were usually positioned in to
dalenske gore (sl. 50B).262 Takve su posude najčešće pri- the graves of prominent females.
lagane u grobove istaknutijih ženskih pokojnica.
Among the other vessels are indispensable the frag-
Od ostalih posuda neizostavni su i ulomci cilindrič- ments of cylindrically shaped vessel or cyst (Fig. 52A).
no oblikovanih posuda ili cista (sl. 52A). Budući da niti Since neither vessel is preserved in the possible shape,
jedna posuda nije očuvana u mogućoj formi, definira- they are defined only by individual typological deter-
ju se samo pojedini tipološko opredjeljivi ulomci koje minable fragments which could be, with a certain con-
fidence, attributed cysts.263 Preserved is a single larger
258 Mihovilić 2001, T. 16. 1. fragment of the upper part and the edge of the ves-
259 Mihovilić 1996, 49, T. V, 70, sl. 21.
260 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 42, 10; T. 43, 12; T. 44, 15. 261 Gabrovec, Mihovilić 1987, 332; Mihovilić 1996, 49; Majnarić-Pandžić 1998, 265;
261 Gabrovec, Mihovilić 1987, 332; Mihovilić 1996, 49; Majnarić-Pandžić 1998, 265; Mihovilić 2001, 101.
Mihovilić 2001, 101. 262 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 14, C3; Turk 2005, 26, k. 31, sl. 31, 75-76; Tecco Hvala
262 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 14, C3; Turk 2005, 26, k. 31, sl. 31, 75-76; Tecco Hvala 2012, 356, sl. 131b; cf. Waisenberg, tumul 2 (Gleirscher 2008, 52, Abb. 15).
2012, 356, sl. 131b; usp. Waisenberg, tumul 2 (Gleirscher 2008, 52, Abb. 15). 263 Blečić Kavur 2014a, 34.
Magdalenske gore, i to tri primjerka poznata iz groba 5th and the 4th cent. BC.
2/46.260 Sukladno estenskim situlama i ti su poklopci
široko datirani u kraj 5. i u 4. st. pr. Kr. The evoked atmosphere should now be understood
also for the situla heritage from Osor which final-
Dočarani ambijent valja sada razumijevati i za situlsku ly prove that the prestigious goods were imported
baštinu, tj. njezine preostale »tragove« iz Osora koji during the end of the 5th and in the 4th cent. BC, as it
nepobitno svjedoče da se prestižna roba uvozila i u to was already proven with the examples from Nesactium
vrijeme kraja 5. i tijekom 4. st. pr. Kr., kako je to već do- (Fig. 51).261
kazano i na nezakcijskim primjercima (sl. 51).261
Beside luxury situlae, bronze fragments of different
Pored luksuznih situla, brončani ulomci različitih shapes demonstrate that in Osor were used also other
oblika svjedoče da su se u Osoru koristile i druge sim- symposium vessels. Two smaller fragments of densely
pozijastičke posude. Dva manja ulomka gusto nare- ribbed bronze sheet, with a lover and rounded profila-
brenog lima, snižene i naglašeno zaobljene profilacije, tion demonstrate that this was most probably a lid of
upozoravaju da su možda služila kao poklopci bronča- a bronze ciborium (Fig. 50A). It was a ritual vessel used
nim ciborijima (sl. 50A). Riječ je o kultnim posudama for sacrifice and which original forms were recorded
za žrtvovanja čije i izvorne forme imamo zabilježene in the monuments of Situla Art. Their lids are usually
u umjetnosti situlskih spomenika. Njihovi poklopci densely ribbed and lowered – a form exclusively repre-
su najčešće gusto narebreni, snižene profilacije što ek- sented by the figural decorated ciborium from Magda-
skluzivno predstavlja figuralno ukrašen ciborij iz Mag- lenska gora.262 Such vessels were usually positioned in to
dalenske gore (sl. 50B).262 Takve su posude najčešće pri- the graves of prominent females.
lagane u grobove istaknutijih ženskih pokojnica.
Among the other vessels are indispensable the frag-
Od ostalih posuda neizostavni su i ulomci cilindrič- ments of cylindrically shaped vessel or cyst (Fig. 52A).
no oblikovanih posuda ili cista (sl. 52A). Budući da niti Since neither vessel is preserved in the possible shape,
jedna posuda nije očuvana u mogućoj formi, definira- they are defined only by individual typological deter-
ju se samo pojedini tipološko opredjeljivi ulomci koje minable fragments which could be, with a certain con-
fidence, attributed cysts.263 Preserved is a single larger
258 Mihovilić 2001, T. 16. 1. fragment of the upper part and the edge of the ves-
259 Mihovilić 1996, 49, T. V, 70, sl. 21.
260 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 42, 10; T. 43, 12; T. 44, 15. 261 Gabrovec, Mihovilić 1987, 332; Mihovilić 1996, 49; Majnarić-Pandžić 1998, 265;
261 Gabrovec, Mihovilić 1987, 332; Mihovilić 1996, 49; Majnarić-Pandžić 1998, 265; Mihovilić 2001, 101.
Mihovilić 2001, 101. 262 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 14, C3; Turk 2005, 26, k. 31, sl. 31, 75-76; Tecco Hvala
262 Tecco Hvala et al. 2004, T. 14, C3; Turk 2005, 26, k. 31, sl. 31, 75-76; Tecco Hvala 2012, 356, sl. 131b; cf. Waisenberg, tumul 2 (Gleirscher 2008, 52, Abb. 15).
2012, 356, sl. 131b; usp. Waisenberg, tumul 2 (Gleirscher 2008, 52, Abb. 15). 263 Blečić Kavur 2014a, 34.
