Page 21 - Kutnar, Andreja, et al., eds., 2015. Proceedings of the 1st COST Action FP1307 International Conference - Life Cycle Assessment, EPDs, and modified wood. University of Primorska Press, Koper.
P. 21
ure
1:
Countries
with
BREEAM
rated
buildings
(green)
and
independent
national
schemes
(blue)
Figure
2:
As
operational
impacts
are
reduced
the
significance
of
embodied
material
impact
increases
Figure
3:
Measuring
against
13
impact
categories
and
conversion
to
an
ecopoint
single
score
References
BRE
2015
BREEAM
(BRE
Environmental
Assessment
Methodology).
www.breeam.org
Green
Guide
2015
The
Green
Guide
to
Specification.
www.thegreenguide.org.uk
9
1:
Countries
with
BREEAM
rated
buildings
(green)
and
independent
national
schemes
(blue)
Figure
2:
As
operational
impacts
are
reduced
the
significance
of
embodied
material
impact
increases
Figure
3:
Measuring
against
13
impact
categories
and
conversion
to
an
ecopoint
single
score
References
BRE
2015
BREEAM
(BRE
Environmental
Assessment
Methodology).
www.breeam.org
Green
Guide
2015
The
Green
Guide
to
Specification.
www.thegreenguide.org.uk
9
