Page 35 - Petelin, Ana, Nejc Šarabon, Boštjan Žvanut, eds. 2017. Zdravje delovno aktivne populacije ▪︎ Health of the Working-Age Population. Proceedings. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem/University of Primorska Press
P. 35
Results
Table 1 shows an overview of 11 studies, that were reviewed.
Table 1: Overview of the studies.
Author/year Purpose of study Used method Results the mammography efficiency in breast cancer detection 33
Sentis, 2010 Use of imaging diagnos- Literature review Magnetic resonance im-
tic methods for BRC in aging (MRI) has high sen-
Wang et al., 2010 young women. Prospective and multicen- sitivity, it detects invasive
Massat, 2014 To assess sensitivity and tre clinical study carcinoma and also carci-
Ying et al., 2012 specificity of combination Literature review noma in situ.
of electrical impedance Control group study
Shao et al., 2013 and ultrasound (US) at Combination of electrical
Kriege et al.2006 BRC detection in young- Prospective study impedance and US would
Brem, 2012 er women to calculate rel- Multicentric study be suitable for BRC de-
ative risk and find out if Literature review tection in younger wom-
there is possible more pre- en regarding to sensitivity
cise imaging method for and specificity.
early BRC detection in
younger women. The best method in wom-
Ways of diagnosing BRC en with dense breast tissue
in women with dense is using MRI.
breast tissue. US has bigger sensitivi-
ty and diagnostic accura-
To compare mammog- cy than mammography,
raphy and US and their specificity is similar. Preci-
combination at BRC de- sion of diagnostic US was
tection. much better than mam-
mography. Combination
Comparison of diagnostic of mammography and US
efficiency of mammogra- increases sensitivity and
phy, US, MRI and combi- diagnostic accuracy.
nation of those methods at Combination of two or
BRC detection. three methods significant-
To research which factors ly improves diagnostic
have impact on sensitivity sensitivity for BRC.
and false positive results at MRI should have been
mammography and MRI permanent screening
in women with family ge- method for BRC in wom-
netic load. en with mutation of gen
Ineffectiveness of mam- BRCA1/2.
mography in women with US also detects chang-
dense breast tissue. es when mammography
is negative and is success-
ful at detecting cancer in
women with dense breast
tissue.
Table 1 shows an overview of 11 studies, that were reviewed.
Table 1: Overview of the studies.
Author/year Purpose of study Used method Results the mammography efficiency in breast cancer detection 33
Sentis, 2010 Use of imaging diagnos- Literature review Magnetic resonance im-
tic methods for BRC in aging (MRI) has high sen-
Wang et al., 2010 young women. Prospective and multicen- sitivity, it detects invasive
Massat, 2014 To assess sensitivity and tre clinical study carcinoma and also carci-
Ying et al., 2012 specificity of combination Literature review noma in situ.
of electrical impedance Control group study
Shao et al., 2013 and ultrasound (US) at Combination of electrical
Kriege et al.2006 BRC detection in young- Prospective study impedance and US would
Brem, 2012 er women to calculate rel- Multicentric study be suitable for BRC de-
ative risk and find out if Literature review tection in younger wom-
there is possible more pre- en regarding to sensitivity
cise imaging method for and specificity.
early BRC detection in
younger women. The best method in wom-
Ways of diagnosing BRC en with dense breast tissue
in women with dense is using MRI.
breast tissue. US has bigger sensitivi-
ty and diagnostic accura-
To compare mammog- cy than mammography,
raphy and US and their specificity is similar. Preci-
combination at BRC de- sion of diagnostic US was
tection. much better than mam-
mography. Combination
Comparison of diagnostic of mammography and US
efficiency of mammogra- increases sensitivity and
phy, US, MRI and combi- diagnostic accuracy.
nation of those methods at Combination of two or
BRC detection. three methods significant-
To research which factors ly improves diagnostic
have impact on sensitivity sensitivity for BRC.
and false positive results at MRI should have been
mammography and MRI permanent screening
in women with family ge- method for BRC in wom-
netic load. en with mutation of gen
Ineffectiveness of mam- BRCA1/2.
mography in women with US also detects chang-
dense breast tissue. es when mammography
is negative and is success-
ful at detecting cancer in
women with dense breast
tissue.
