Page 39 - Petelin, Ana, Nejc Šarabon, Boštjan Žvanut, eds. 2017. Zdravje delovno aktivne populacije ▪︎ Health of the Working-Age Population. Proceedings. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem/University of Primorska Press
P. 39
raphy and MRI in women whit inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast the mammography efficiency in breast cancer detection 37
cancer research and treatment, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 109–119.
MASSAT, M.B., 2014. Technology Trends: Calling in reinforcments – Wom-
en with dense breasts get help from ultrasound, molecular imaging, and
MRI. Applied radiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 34–38.
MAYO CLINIC, 2015. Dense breast tissue: what it means to have dense breasts
[online]. [viewed 10. 5. 2017 ]. Avaible from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/te-
sts-procedures/mammogram/in-depth/dense-breast-tissue/art-20123968
MORRIS, E., FEIG, S.A., DREXLER, M. in LEHMAN, C., 2015. Implications of
overdiagnosis: impact on screening mammography practices. Population
health management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–11.
NARULA, P.S., 2016. Mammographic density and the rist and detection of
breast cancer. International journal od health and life science, vol. 2, no.
2, pp. 48–54.
NASS, J.S., HENDERSON, I.C. in LASHOF, J.C., 2001. Mammography and be-
yond: developing technologies fort he early detection of breast cancer.
Washington: National academy press, pp. 15–55.
NELSON, H.D., O´MEARA, E.S., KERLIKOWSKE, K., BALCH, S. in MI-
GLIORETTI, D., 2016. Factors acssociated with rates of false positive and
false negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis
of registry data. Annals of internal medicine, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 226–235.
OLSEN, M.L., MORTON, M. J., STAN, D.L., PRUHTI, S., 2012. Is There a Role
for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Palpable Breast Masses
When Mammogram and Ultrasound Are Negative?. Journal of women’s
health, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1149 – 1154.
PRIMIC-ŽAKELJ M., ARKO D., RENER M. in ŽGAJNAR J., 2003. Rak dojk v
Sloveniji: Epidemiologija in presejanje. Zdravniški vestnik, vol. 72, no. 2,
pp. 179-181.
RUOCCO, M.J., 2016. Improving screening mammography: perspective of a
community radiologist. Applied radiology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 26–29.
SARDANELLI, F., PODO, F., SANTORO, F., MANOUKIAN, S., BERGON-
ZI, S., TRECATE, G., VERGNAGHI, D., FEDERICO, M., CORTESI, L.,
CORCIONE, S. et. al., 2011. Multicenter surveillance of women at high
genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and
contrast– enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high berast can-
cer risk italian 1 study): final results. Investigative radiology, vol. 46, no.
2, pp. 94–105.
SENTIS, M., 2010. Imaging diagnosis of young women with breast cancer.
Breast cancer research and treatment, vol. 123, nu. 1, pp. 1–13.
SHAO, H., LI, B., ZHANG, X., XIONG, Z., LIU, Y., TANG, G., 2013. Compari-
son of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using
mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different comninations of these
cancer research and treatment, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 109–119.
MASSAT, M.B., 2014. Technology Trends: Calling in reinforcments – Wom-
en with dense breasts get help from ultrasound, molecular imaging, and
MRI. Applied radiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 34–38.
MAYO CLINIC, 2015. Dense breast tissue: what it means to have dense breasts
[online]. [viewed 10. 5. 2017 ]. Avaible from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/te-
sts-procedures/mammogram/in-depth/dense-breast-tissue/art-20123968
MORRIS, E., FEIG, S.A., DREXLER, M. in LEHMAN, C., 2015. Implications of
overdiagnosis: impact on screening mammography practices. Population
health management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–11.
NARULA, P.S., 2016. Mammographic density and the rist and detection of
breast cancer. International journal od health and life science, vol. 2, no.
2, pp. 48–54.
NASS, J.S., HENDERSON, I.C. in LASHOF, J.C., 2001. Mammography and be-
yond: developing technologies fort he early detection of breast cancer.
Washington: National academy press, pp. 15–55.
NELSON, H.D., O´MEARA, E.S., KERLIKOWSKE, K., BALCH, S. in MI-
GLIORETTI, D., 2016. Factors acssociated with rates of false positive and
false negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis
of registry data. Annals of internal medicine, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 226–235.
OLSEN, M.L., MORTON, M. J., STAN, D.L., PRUHTI, S., 2012. Is There a Role
for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Palpable Breast Masses
When Mammogram and Ultrasound Are Negative?. Journal of women’s
health, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1149 – 1154.
PRIMIC-ŽAKELJ M., ARKO D., RENER M. in ŽGAJNAR J., 2003. Rak dojk v
Sloveniji: Epidemiologija in presejanje. Zdravniški vestnik, vol. 72, no. 2,
pp. 179-181.
RUOCCO, M.J., 2016. Improving screening mammography: perspective of a
community radiologist. Applied radiology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 26–29.
SARDANELLI, F., PODO, F., SANTORO, F., MANOUKIAN, S., BERGON-
ZI, S., TRECATE, G., VERGNAGHI, D., FEDERICO, M., CORTESI, L.,
CORCIONE, S. et. al., 2011. Multicenter surveillance of women at high
genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and
contrast– enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high berast can-
cer risk italian 1 study): final results. Investigative radiology, vol. 46, no.
2, pp. 94–105.
SENTIS, M., 2010. Imaging diagnosis of young women with breast cancer.
Breast cancer research and treatment, vol. 123, nu. 1, pp. 1–13.
SHAO, H., LI, B., ZHANG, X., XIONG, Z., LIU, Y., TANG, G., 2013. Compari-
son of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using
mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different comninations of these
