Page 25 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(1) (2025)
P. 25

or religious significance. This dissonance creat-  (Huyssen 1993). Communities have respond-
               ed conflicts in public memory, leading to a frag-  ed to their history under/within Soviet authori-
               mented understanding of history (Tunbridge   ty, with parliament buildings serving as tangible
               and Ashworth 1996). Along this line of thought,   representations of a challenging past. As such,
               we propose reimagining the architecture and   these physical symbols of collective memories
               spatial organisation of parliament squares as   were contested in the processes of a new politi-
               platforms for public dissent. We will see how   cal consciousness.
               they became privileged scenes where societies
               elaborated on their troubled past. Memory pol-  Methodology
               itics relies on public visibility, which aims at fix-  The spatialisation of political phenomena intro-
               ing certain events or figures in a solid form made   duces architectural studies to a sphere of map-
               of stone or concrete. At the same time, memo-  ping cultural heritage with a new perspective.
               ry activism counters dominant narratives on   Human and non-human actors, the crowd and     25
               the same public ground, offering public expres-  the parliament building, function as a whole
               sions of critique in a performative dimension   corpus to find their own reason for existence. In
               (Gutman and Wüstenberg 2023; Huyssen 2003).   this contribution we focus on the architectural
               The protests analysed below, we argue, were col-  memory and architectonic transformations of
               lective expressions of this kind in a climate of   parliament buildings analysed with large-scale
               decommunisation.                            axonometric drawings. The axonometric gaze is
                   Nationalist discourses build societal uni-  an abstract point of view, one that does not ex-
               ty by inventing rituals, historical narratives,   ist, one that the Modernist architecture adopt-
               and collective memory to construct the myth   ed because it was supposed to render the visual-
               of the nation (Hobsbawm and Ranger 1983).   isation of forms objective. The visibility of state
               Throughout  the post-Soviet  countries, this ex-  narratives was generally achieved through large
               ploration is inseparable from the process of de-  squares and boulevards that became scenes of  The Critical Position of Soviet Parliament Buildings Today
               communisation  –  a  transformation  that goes   the nation-building process (Avcı Hosanlı and
               hand in hand with navigating the delicate tran-  Resta 2021).
               sition from a multinational past to the crystalli-  The axonometric views proposed in this
               sation of distinct national identities, and strate-  contribution serve the purpose of mediating the
               gies for confronting the Soviet traces in the built   Cartesian organisation of monumental build-
               environment. Andreas Huyssen (1993) critical-  ings with fleeting snapshots of moments of dis-
               ly approaches the relation of monuments and   sent. In other words, they show the fixed forms
               memory from a paradoxical perspective, claim-  of dominant narratives in contrast with the per-
               ing monuments may stand to remember, while   formative acts of dissent. We intend drawing
               also becoming symbols of forgetting. In a sim-  as an interpretative practice to observe and de-
               ilar vein, the Soviet parliament buildings, with   scribe  historical  facts,  study  the  movement  of
               their interpretation and re-interpretation, have   people across the squares, and understand the
               been transformed into a tool for not only for-  formation of groups and clearings according to
               getting the Soviet past and its power, but also re-  the spatial layout of the squares. Some of these
               membering the great social movements when se-  principles have already been implemented in
               ceding from the union. Even if they belong to a   what  is  called  graphic  anthropology  (Ingold
               traumatic past, the materiality of the parliament   2011). To examine how architecture conveys
               buildings prevents the speedy flattening of the   state narratives, we will analyse key moments of
               historical dimension acquired through media   rallies and protests as depicted in local media, in
               images from obliterating the distance and the   relation to the visual significance of parliament
               forgetting that is needed to form social memory     buildings. Published visual material, combined
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30