Page 90 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 10(2) (2022)
P. 90
Anastylosis
• High level of authenticity, if the reassembling is made • The material is usually left exposed to the effects of weath-
correctly; er; this can be overcome by applying additional protective
• Immediate and overall understanding of the building and structures;
its features. • The process of reassembling and replacement can affect
the original substance of the structure;
• Some elements may have been reused in different build-
ings from different periods, so their use in one reassembled
structure prevents their use in others;
• There is always a risk of mistakes in reassembling the
elements.
Translocation
• Sometimes translocation is the only way to save a monu- • High costs and technical difficulties.
ment from destruction.
studia universitatis her editati, letnik 10 (2022), številk a 2 / volume 10 (2022), number 2 90
preciate such true to scale ground plans, as well
hereditati as additional explanation by interpretive media
(Table 6; fig. 9).
Figure 8: Veii (Italy), Portonaccio temple with architec- Figure 9: Künzing (Germany), visualisation of the Ro-
tural elements indicated by stylized additions (photo Liv- man amphitheatre using a simple wooden structure
ioandronico2013, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ (photo Katharina Zanier).
File:Tempio_di_veio.JPG).
In situ integration of the missing parts and
In some cases, archaeological remains substitution of the whole can be performed also
themselves cannot be displayed directly, for ex- in an immaterial way, using light projections
ample, because the area has to be used for other and holograms. These solutions are not invasive
non-compatible purposes, or the type of materi- and surely represent appealing attractions due to
als of the original substance are not suitable for their innovative character (Table 6; fig. 10).
display. One option is the substitution of origi-
nal features by using alternative elements which
allows displaying ground plans of archaeologi-
cal remains by using vegetation/shrubs or differ-
ent building materials inserted into the paving.
This kind of display could be appropriate for ar-
chaeological sites where the remains are main-
ly known from non-invasive research, especial-
ly geophysical surveys. In some cases, viewing
platforms can be necessary in order to fully ap-
• High level of authenticity, if the reassembling is made • The material is usually left exposed to the effects of weath-
correctly; er; this can be overcome by applying additional protective
• Immediate and overall understanding of the building and structures;
its features. • The process of reassembling and replacement can affect
the original substance of the structure;
• Some elements may have been reused in different build-
ings from different periods, so their use in one reassembled
structure prevents their use in others;
• There is always a risk of mistakes in reassembling the
elements.
Translocation
• Sometimes translocation is the only way to save a monu- • High costs and technical difficulties.
ment from destruction.
studia universitatis her editati, letnik 10 (2022), številk a 2 / volume 10 (2022), number 2 90
preciate such true to scale ground plans, as well
hereditati as additional explanation by interpretive media
(Table 6; fig. 9).
Figure 8: Veii (Italy), Portonaccio temple with architec- Figure 9: Künzing (Germany), visualisation of the Ro-
tural elements indicated by stylized additions (photo Liv- man amphitheatre using a simple wooden structure
ioandronico2013, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ (photo Katharina Zanier).
File:Tempio_di_veio.JPG).
In situ integration of the missing parts and
In some cases, archaeological remains substitution of the whole can be performed also
themselves cannot be displayed directly, for ex- in an immaterial way, using light projections
ample, because the area has to be used for other and holograms. These solutions are not invasive
non-compatible purposes, or the type of materi- and surely represent appealing attractions due to
als of the original substance are not suitable for their innovative character (Table 6; fig. 10).
display. One option is the substitution of origi-
nal features by using alternative elements which
allows displaying ground plans of archaeologi-
cal remains by using vegetation/shrubs or differ-
ent building materials inserted into the paving.
This kind of display could be appropriate for ar-
chaeological sites where the remains are main-
ly known from non-invasive research, especial-
ly geophysical surveys. In some cases, viewing
platforms can be necessary in order to fully ap-
