Page 100 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 11(2) (2023)
P. 100

them terribly; they needed some time to be...   (Interlocutor 2) also emphasized this new reali-
                   The one who could not do that, left. [Inter-  ty. He remembers his mother’s experience dur-
                   locutor 6]                              ing the FTT years:
                   It was therefore a two-way situation with   My mum and her friends smuggled goods
               the urban areas dependent on labour and agri-   across the border. It was not really to break
               cultural products, and the rural areas on trade   the law, but to survive. It was a need because
               and jobs. In the years and decades following the   there were goods you could not find in zone
               end of World War II, the urban centre lost its ru-  B… All the women in the village were smug-
               ral supply of goods for trade and its workforce.   gling… My mum got caught once by the
               The other side, the rural area, lost the centre   graničarji [border guards], smuggling eggs…
               where people sold their products and migrated   my dad told me this story later, she was
        100    for work, and which enabled them to carry out   ashamed and didn’t want to talk about it…
               their principal economic activity and increase
                                                               she went to prison for a few days…controls
               their income (Verginella 2021; Kalc 2008; Pa-   were very strict… but 90% of people smug-
        studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 11 (2023), številka 2 / volume 11 (2023), number 2
               njek and Lazarević 2018). It is important to em-  gled to have a better life.             ti
               phasize that the interconnections or interrela-  Our mothers also went; my mother went
               tions existed on both sides and this new reality   in the evening. They used to take eggs, tra-
               caused an ‘absence’ on both sides of the border,   pa,  wine,  and then there  was  the border,
               causing a drastic loss of income and a possible fall   there was a fence, and they had to crawl un-  ta
               in living standards.Suddenly divided by a new   der the fence to sell the robes the next morn-
               state border, the population reacted in different   ing… yes, at night, because they carried a bit
               ways. The main goal was to maintain economic    more. I remember our aunt Ema from Šan-
               ties with Trieste. The historian Marta Verginel-  toma [near Koper, note PK], my father Vic-  di
               la explains that most of the population in the ru-  tor’s sister; she and our mother and all the
               ral areas, regardless of their political, ideologi-  women together brought 200 eggs. My aunt
               cal or national affiliation, continued to cross the   came once a week to collect the money. [In-
               border and work in Trieste. In 1947, for example,   terlocutor 7]
               around 2,000 workers and people who sold their
               products in Trieste went there every day. The Yu-  These  examples  show  that  since  the  early
               goslav communist authorities in zone B tried to   modern period, it was women in particular who   here
               obstruct mobility across the demarcation line, as   travelled to the urban areas to sell the surplus of
               they considered this practice of going to work in   their agricultural products. For example, women
               the capitalist ‘other’ side a bad example. It was an   purchased grain in Trieste, used it to make bread
               ideologically controversial activity. The Yugoslav   and then sold it back to the city. This type of ac-
               authorities implemented several direct or indi-  tivity also enabled a better economic standard as
               rect sanctions to prevent this transit (Verginella   well as women’s economic independence and an
               2021). We need to understand that in the period   important role in decision-making in the family
               after the end of World War II, the town of Kop-  (Verginella 2021).
               er and its hinterland were still ‘underdeveloped’   As has been mentioned, in the years 1947
               and unindustrialized (Žitko et al. 1992). Most of   to 1954, crossing over to zone A of the FTT was
               the inhabitants ‘made their livelihoods by fish-  limited by the Yugoslav military government.
               ing, seafaring, salt farming, agriculture, retail   Severe restrictions and  regulations were intro-
               trade and crafts’. An important work activity   duced to limit transit between the zones. The                        studiauniversitatis
               involved daily migration to Trieste but the war   problem was that qualified workers who were
               and the post-war demarcation aggravated the sit-  needed in zone B were working in Trieste in-
               uation (Kralj and Rener 2019). One interlocutor   stead of in the communist zone. Even former
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105