Page 99 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 11(2) (2023)
P. 99

er, they were also fighting, and the police   sea change in the study of borders. During
                   came to make peace. Until they [the states   the recent history of border studies, there
                   involved, note PK] agreed on the border and   has been a shift from the consideration of
                   established the national borders according   borders as mere geographical demarcations
                   to the law.... so, with these stakes… the house   to a perspective that emphasizes the chang-
                   was right on the border line... here was the   ing meaning of borders, different types of
                   border where the house was and the yard...   borders with different functions, and the so-
                   they tried to divide the yard and the house   cial construction of borders.
                   in half... it was all hypocrisy and bad neigh-  In this perspective I am not interested in
                   bours... and this poor poor man was so tor-  studying the post-war political circumstances,
                   mented that he went at night to move the   disputes, antagonisms, negotiations and demon-
                   stakes, so his house would be left with the   strations of political power, but how people living
                   whole yard. But the best fields still remained   on the newly established border –  which abrupt-  99
                   under Yugoslavia on the other side, in Ga-
 ti                brovica [village in Northern Istria, note PK].   ly interrupted ‘traditional’ interconnections and
                                                           interdependence in the area – managed to ad-
                   And that man needed a permit every time
                   he went to work on his land, and that was the   just to the new reality. What significantly char-
                                                           acterized the second half of the previous centu-
 ta                even after the border was settled... that hate   ry, especially the first decades after the war, was
                   dispute  that remained for  years  and  years,
                                                           the sudden absence of the ‘other side’ of the ter-
                   remained until death... [Interlocutor 14]
                   However, different experiences show dif-  ritory, a territorial discontinuity. As one of my
                                                           interlocutors explained: ‘My mother used to say
 di            were only children when the demarcation line   was fascism, before there was Austro-Hungary,
                                                           there was a big of change... before, before there
               ferent points of view. For some people who
                                                           there was one state, Italy was one country and all
               was set, the memories may be different and not
                                                           of a sudden there was a border’ (Interlocutor 7).
               that ‘traumatic’: ‘I don’t remember when they
 here          but they were giving chocolate, they were giv-  the city (Trieste) and its rural hinterland were  everyday life in the borderland area between yugoslavia and italy after wwii ...
                                                               Economic, social and family ties between
               were fixing… [the  demarcation line, note PK],
                                                           severed. As my interlocutors pointed out, ‘Back
               ing chocolate to children… there were Ameri-
                                                           then it was one country, there were no prob-
               cans and English living next door, the Scottish
               were marching through the village singing with
                                                           lems, people went to Istria for goods, and wom-
                                                           en went to Trieste to sell goods… lived with each
               bagpipes until 1953, the Trieste crisis’ (Interloc-
                                                           other... men went to work... and then, once they
               utor 15).
                   These examples clearly reflect the ‘reality’
                                                           locutor 8).
               of living in the area, which was divided by the
                   studiauniversitatis
               ‘newly’ established border. Considering the trea-  cut it off... you run out of everything...’ (Inter-
                                                               Of course, there was Italy and no one knew
               ties mentioned in the previous paragraph, the   the border. Then, when the border came it
               ‘other side of history’ is becoming more compre-  was a disaster for the nation [in the sense of
               hensible. The official side, consisting of political   the people, the population, note PK] to get
               agreements, provides only a part of the overall   used to it… Then they drew the line and the
               circumstances. As explained by the political sci-  other system came and there it was. They
               entist Bastian Sendhardt (2013, 25–26):
                                                               were just used to it anyway, they went to Ital-
                   For a long time, the study of borders was fo-  ian schools at that time too, the ones who
                   cused on state borders as static ontological   were nationally aware, Yugoslavia, Italy… Be-
                   entities with predominantly physical fea-   cause yesterday there was no such thing, it
                   tures, but the past two decades have seen a   was like cutting this table in half. It bothered
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104