Page 31 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 12(2) (2024)
P. 31

From a sensory studies perspective, the in-  sensory and spiritual impact. The acoustics, par-
               teraction between light and sacred imagery en-  ticularly how sound reverberates off the stone
               gages the visual cortex to deepen the observer’s   walls and domes, amplify the auditory experi-
               experience of the sacred (Pentcheva 2010, 141,   ence  of religious rituals (Đorđević et  al.  2019,
               154, 184; Stejskal 2019, 55–66). The architectur-  192–212). Cognitive science suggests that sound
               al manipulation of light and the symbolic place-  can evoke emotional or meditative states, facili-
               ment of figures like Danica and Dušan create   tating deeper contemplation, especially in sacred
               a multisensory environment where the Divine   spaces. Echoes of hymns and chants contrib-
               is both seen and felt. The rhythmic patterns of   ute to a heightened sense of the sacred, comple-
               brickwork and arches engage the visual sense   menting the visual elements and deepening the
               while creating a tactile quality, invoking ‘hap-  spiritual atmosphere (Pentcheva 2017; Troels-
               tic visuality,’ where touch is simulated through   gard 2018, 52–77).
               sight (Betancourt 2016, 660–689). This tactile   Religious studies emphasize the embodied   31
               experience is further enhanced by the textured   nature of religious experience, suggesting that
               mortar layers, reflecting the visual rhythm of the   the sensory environment of sacred spaces is in-
               space.                                      tentionally designed to engage both body and
                   The auditory dimension of St Nicholas   mind in devotion. The ktetorial portrait of Dan-
               Church also plays a critical role in shaping its   ica, combined with the strategic play of light and
                                                           King Dušan’s likeness, guides the observer’s sen-
                   glance (or as it might be mistakenly assumed to be the only
                   possible location for the ktetor’s portrait; Đorđević 1994,   sory focus toward the sacred. As it opens to al-
                   146). For comparison, King Uroš II Milutin is also depict-  low light in, the portal symbolically bridges the
                   ed as New Constantine on the northern side across from
                   the northwest column in the Church of St George in Sta-  earthly realm with the Divine, inviting the be-
                   ro Nagoričino (Cvetković 2023, 667– 692; for Staro Nago-  holder into a spiritual journey within the church.
                   ričino cf. 679–680; fig. 7). Literature frequently mentions   Bearing in mind that the Theotokos with Christ
                   that this is not an easily noticeable position; however, this
                   idea is not coincidental, particularly considering that by   was depicted on the west façade of Ljuboten, it
                   the late 13th and the beginning of 14th century, the con-  is important to recall the Great Lenten Mat-
                   cept of the ruler as defender of true faith emerged across
                   from the column as symbol in architecture. The ruler’s as-  ins, during which the Theotokos is invoked as
                   sociation with this column signifies his role as a pillar of   the ‘Gate of Heaven,’ opening the gates of mer- Sensory Encounters: Decoding the Symbolism of St Nicholas Church in Ljuboten
                   support for the Church and its teachings. A nearly iden-
                   tical presentation was repeated in the Church of the Vir-  cy, symbolizing her role as the image of Incar-
                   gin of the Black Mount above Mateič. Emperor Dušan is   nate Logos. The Great Lenten Matins has a dis-
                   depicted on a pilaster that slightly protrudes from the rest
                   of the southern wall’s surface (Dimitrova 2002, 185–186,   tinctive conclusion, namely, after ‘Trisagion’ and
                   and on the Holy warrior saint across the Emperor Dušan   ‘Our Father,’ instead of the usual troparion to
                   esp. page 197). He is shown directly across the southeast   the saint, the following is read: ‘In the temple
                   column, on which one of the holy warriors is depicted. It
                   is important to mention that all three portraits are always   stood Your glory, I think I stand in heaven, O
                   shown close to the entrance structure. Only in the case of   Theotokos, Gate of Heaven, open to us the gates
                   Ljuboten can we see that the relationship with the west-
                   ern entrance is the same as in Staro Nagoričino (the por-  of Your mercy.’ Since she gave birth to Christ,
                   trait is to the left of the portal, cf. Ćirić 2023, 122). Only   the medallion, or paraphrase of Psalm 46, ‘God
                   in Ljuboten is the portrait on the northern side precise-
                   ly aligned with the axis of the southern portal. When the   is in the midst of her,’ is inscribed on her bos-
                   doors were originally opened, the light passing through   om (Mercenier, Mercenier, and Paris, 1947, 132;
                   them would have directly illuminated the portrait of the
                   king and queen with their son Uroš. The text addressing is-  Ćirić 2015, 353).
                   sues of the portraits in Mateič and the question of patron-  Hence, it is of great importance that the
                   age, co-authored by Dr. Branislav Cvetković and myself, is   church’s patroness is positioned right next to the
                   being prepared for the monograph published by Trivent:
                   Women and Power in the Late Medieval and Early Mod-  west portal, with the intercession of Theotokos
                   ern Southeast and Central Europe (1300–1600), edited by   with Christ in the lunette (it is obviously inten-
                   Melina Rokai, Budapest 2025 (Ćirić and Cvetković forth-
                   coming).                                tional that Theotokos with Christ, rather than
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36