Page 20 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 9(1) (2021)
P. 20
dia universitatis her editati, letnik 9 (2021), številk a 1 / volume 9 (2021), number 1 20the mentioned sites with available dates shall be7,210±40 BP, 6,100–6,010 (1σ) cal BC,
provided below. 7,180±45 BP, 6,080–6,000 (1σ) cal BC,
hereditati 7,157±37 BP, 6,060–6,000 (1σ) cal BC,
Calibrated dates BC (1σ) for Slatina-Sofia, 7,140±40 BP, 6,050–5,990 (1σ) cal BC,
Gălăbnik and Kovačevo (Reingruber and Thissen 7,105±40 BP, 6,030–5,920 (1σ) cal BC,
2005). 7,090±70 BP, 6,030–5,890 (1σ) cal BC,
7,055±40 BP, 5,990–5,900 (1σ) cal BC,
Slatina-Sofia 7,028±35 BP, 5,990–5,880 (1σ) cal BC,
6,970±60 BP, 5,970–5,780 (1σ) cal BC, 6,990±45 BP, 5,970–5,810 (1σ) cal BC,
6,960±60 BP, 5,900–5,760 (1σ) cal BC, 6,980±65 BP, 5,980–5,790 (1σ) cal BC,
6,940±60 BP, 5,880–5,750 (1σ) cal BC, 6,975±50 BP, 5,970–5,790 (1σ) cal BC,
6,890±60 BP, 5,840–5,720 (1σ) cal BC, 6,760±160 BP, 5,840–5,520 (1σ) cal BC,
6,860±50 BP, 5,800–5,675 (1σ) cal BC, 6,830±85 BP, 5,800–5,630 (1σ) cal BC.
6,840±60 BP, 5,780–5,660 (1σ) cal BC,
6,830±60 BP, 5,760–5,650 (1σ) cal BC, According to Todorova and Vaysov (1993,
6,810±50 BP, 5,730–5,660 (1σ) cal BC, 89), the first phase of the EN in western Bulgar-
6,780±60 BP, 5,720–5,640 (1σ) cal BC. ia is the so-called monochrome phase in which
no painted ornaments are found – registered
Gălăbnik at some sites in Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.
7,220±80 BP, 6,210–6,010 (1σ) cal BC, From the sites that are the subject of this anal-
7,120±70 BP, 6,070–5,910 (1σ) cal BC, ysis, only one is included – Krajnici, determined
7,114±53 BP, 6,050–5,920 (1σ) cal BC, within the earliest, monochrome or early ceram-
7,140±80 BP, 6,090–5,910 (1σ) cal BC, ic phase (Todorova and Vaysov 1993, 75; Čo-
7,100±80 BP, 6,060–5,890 (1σ) cal BC, hadžhiev, Bakamska and Ninov 2007, 181). On
7,030±70 BP, 5,990–5,840 (1σ) cal BC, the basis of the comparative method and the ab-
7,070±180 BP, 6,090–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, solute chronology Todorova and Vaysov (1993,
7,070±60 BP, 6,010–5,890 (1σ) cal BC, 89) propose the following periodization of the
7,020±60 BP, 5,990–5,840 (1σ) cal BC, EN in Bulgaria: the monochrome phase or the
7,020±150 BP, 6,020–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, BRN – M (Bulgarian EN – Monochrome) be-
6,970±50 BP, 5,970–5,780 (1σ) cal BC, tween 6,400–6,200 cal BC; the EN with white
6,950±70 BP, 5,900–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, painted pottery Neolithic BRN – A (Bulgarian
6,790±80 BP, 5,750–5,620 (1σ) cal BC, EN – phase A) (comparable to the Macedonian
6,760±80 BP, 5,740–5,570 (1σ) cal BC, EN) between 6,200–5,700 cal BC; and the dark
6,760±60 BP, 5,720–5,630 (1σ) cal BC, painted Neolithic or BRN – B (Bulgarian EN –
6,710±60 BP, 5,710–5,560 (1σ) cal BC, phase B) (comparable to the Macedonian MN)
6,670±70 BP, 5,650–5,530 (1σ) cal BC. between 5,700–5,500 cal BC.
Kovačevo On the basis of the absolute dates, the above
7,245±36 BP, 6,210–6,050 (1σ) cal BC, mentioned authors created periodization of the
7,222±37 BP, 6,210–6,020 (1σ) cal BC, Macedonian and Bulgarian EN. In this con-
7,235±40 BP, 6,210–6,040 (1σ) cal BC, text, I propose the acceptance of the highest val-
ues a ccording to Todorova and Vaysov for West-
ern Bulgarian Neolithic and the highest values
for Macedonian Neolithic according to Gim-
butas with wider range for the EN dates, be-
provided below. 7,180±45 BP, 6,080–6,000 (1σ) cal BC,
hereditati 7,157±37 BP, 6,060–6,000 (1σ) cal BC,
Calibrated dates BC (1σ) for Slatina-Sofia, 7,140±40 BP, 6,050–5,990 (1σ) cal BC,
Gălăbnik and Kovačevo (Reingruber and Thissen 7,105±40 BP, 6,030–5,920 (1σ) cal BC,
2005). 7,090±70 BP, 6,030–5,890 (1σ) cal BC,
7,055±40 BP, 5,990–5,900 (1σ) cal BC,
Slatina-Sofia 7,028±35 BP, 5,990–5,880 (1σ) cal BC,
6,970±60 BP, 5,970–5,780 (1σ) cal BC, 6,990±45 BP, 5,970–5,810 (1σ) cal BC,
6,960±60 BP, 5,900–5,760 (1σ) cal BC, 6,980±65 BP, 5,980–5,790 (1σ) cal BC,
6,940±60 BP, 5,880–5,750 (1σ) cal BC, 6,975±50 BP, 5,970–5,790 (1σ) cal BC,
6,890±60 BP, 5,840–5,720 (1σ) cal BC, 6,760±160 BP, 5,840–5,520 (1σ) cal BC,
6,860±50 BP, 5,800–5,675 (1σ) cal BC, 6,830±85 BP, 5,800–5,630 (1σ) cal BC.
6,840±60 BP, 5,780–5,660 (1σ) cal BC,
6,830±60 BP, 5,760–5,650 (1σ) cal BC, According to Todorova and Vaysov (1993,
6,810±50 BP, 5,730–5,660 (1σ) cal BC, 89), the first phase of the EN in western Bulgar-
6,780±60 BP, 5,720–5,640 (1σ) cal BC. ia is the so-called monochrome phase in which
no painted ornaments are found – registered
Gălăbnik at some sites in Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia.
7,220±80 BP, 6,210–6,010 (1σ) cal BC, From the sites that are the subject of this anal-
7,120±70 BP, 6,070–5,910 (1σ) cal BC, ysis, only one is included – Krajnici, determined
7,114±53 BP, 6,050–5,920 (1σ) cal BC, within the earliest, monochrome or early ceram-
7,140±80 BP, 6,090–5,910 (1σ) cal BC, ic phase (Todorova and Vaysov 1993, 75; Čo-
7,100±80 BP, 6,060–5,890 (1σ) cal BC, hadžhiev, Bakamska and Ninov 2007, 181). On
7,030±70 BP, 5,990–5,840 (1σ) cal BC, the basis of the comparative method and the ab-
7,070±180 BP, 6,090–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, solute chronology Todorova and Vaysov (1993,
7,070±60 BP, 6,010–5,890 (1σ) cal BC, 89) propose the following periodization of the
7,020±60 BP, 5,990–5,840 (1σ) cal BC, EN in Bulgaria: the monochrome phase or the
7,020±150 BP, 6,020–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, BRN – M (Bulgarian EN – Monochrome) be-
6,970±50 BP, 5,970–5,780 (1σ) cal BC, tween 6,400–6,200 cal BC; the EN with white
6,950±70 BP, 5,900–5,740 (1σ) cal BC, painted pottery Neolithic BRN – A (Bulgarian
6,790±80 BP, 5,750–5,620 (1σ) cal BC, EN – phase A) (comparable to the Macedonian
6,760±80 BP, 5,740–5,570 (1σ) cal BC, EN) between 6,200–5,700 cal BC; and the dark
6,760±60 BP, 5,720–5,630 (1σ) cal BC, painted Neolithic or BRN – B (Bulgarian EN –
6,710±60 BP, 5,710–5,560 (1σ) cal BC, phase B) (comparable to the Macedonian MN)
6,670±70 BP, 5,650–5,530 (1σ) cal BC. between 5,700–5,500 cal BC.
Kovačevo On the basis of the absolute dates, the above
7,245±36 BP, 6,210–6,050 (1σ) cal BC, mentioned authors created periodization of the
7,222±37 BP, 6,210–6,020 (1σ) cal BC, Macedonian and Bulgarian EN. In this con-
7,235±40 BP, 6,210–6,040 (1σ) cal BC, text, I propose the acceptance of the highest val-
ues a ccording to Todorova and Vaysov for West-
ern Bulgarian Neolithic and the highest values
for Macedonian Neolithic according to Gim-
butas with wider range for the EN dates, be-
