Page 82 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(1) (2025)
P. 82

Kot kaže raziskava na Krasu, arheološko znanje ne   processes (e.g. a cairn as field clearance, a collapsed
               nastaja linearno, temveč iz prepleta različnih in-  wall, or a ruined structure). Since features occur
               terpretativnih niti, ki vključujejo tudi materialne   in clusters and form complex archaeological land-
               intervencije na terenu, analogije in kontekstualno   scapes, field verification targets representative ex-
               umeščenost v krajinsko logiko.              amples, testing patterns and spatial logics rather
                                                           than individual occurrences.
               Summary                                         The empirical focus of the study lies in the Di-
               This paper examines the role of field verification   vača Karst and Vrhe. Several complexes of features
               in  the  interpretation  of  airborne  laser  scanning   identified on ALS imagery were verified through
               (ALS) data on the Karst plateau. This is a highly   visual inspection, geomagnetic survey, and tar-
               specific landscape, where natural geomorphic pro-  geted excavation. Results broadly confirmed that
               cesses are slow and traces of human activity remain   most features are anthropogenic and prehistor-
               exceptionally well preserved. For this reason, the   ic in origin, while also revealing greater variabil-
        82     Karst is a key area for investigating, through ALS   ity than suggested by morphology alone. Cairns
               and high-resolution digital terrain models, how ar-  proved to be unsorted piles of local limestone, of-
        studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 13 (2025), številka 1 / volume 13 (2025), number 1
               chaeological traces manifest in the surface record.  ten directly on bedrock, with unexpected accu-
                   ALS enables the systematic identification of   mulations of fine sediment indicating long-term
               surface anomalies, both positive (banks, walls,   aeolian and paedogenetic processes. Most lacked
               cairns) and negative (pits, ditches, hollows). How-  finds, though occasional ceramic fragments al-
               ever, morphology alone does not guarantee ar-  lowed a Bronze Age attribution. Linear structures
               chaeological interpretation. Many anomalies re-  proved more heterogeneous: some were clearance
               main in an ‘epistemological limbo’: described but   walls,  others  collapsed  dry-stone  constructions,
               unconfirmed, detected but unexplained. The cen-  and in a few cases substantial double-faced walls
               tral question is when, and on what grounds, we can   built with considerable labour investment. Par-
               consider a surface form to represent an archaeolog-  ticularly striking were the massive walls at Dren-
               ical trace.                                 je and Sigurni hrib, interpreted as boundaries of
                   The theoretical framework of the paper builds   landholding or agrarian infrastructure, reliably
               on Alison Wylie’s notion of ‘cabling’, which un-  dated to prehistory. Geomagnetic survey added a
               derstands archaeological knowledge as cumulative   further dimension, identifying sub-surface traces
               reasoning  based on  the intertwining of  multiple   of habitation, invisible on the surface, confirming
               strands of evidence. Interpretation arises not from   that ALS provides only a partial view of archaeo-
               a single data point, but from the combination of   logical reality.
               morphological and spatial logic (ALS), stratigra-  The study makes three main contributions:
               phy, material composition, finds, analogy, and lo-  (1) Epistemological: ALS interpretation is not a
               cal context. Each strand may be weak on its own,   neutral process but a reflective and transparent
               but together they form a robust interpretative bun-  one. Research must document how strands of ar-
               dle. Interpretation is thus a process of inference   gument are assembled, from choices of visualiza-
               to the best explanation, where credibility derives   tion to field decisions. Good interpretation is not
               from interweaving, not from isolated proofs.  only technically correct but also methodologically
                   Within this framework, field verification   accountable. (2) Methodological: field verification
               plays a crucial role. It is not a binary operation of   is most effective when testing patterns and spatial
               confirmation or rejection, but a node in the inter-  configurations rather than isolated anomalies. The
               pretative process where abstract anomalies meet   combination of ALS, geophysics, and targeted ex-
               concrete material traces. Material interventions,   cavation creates synergies that exceed the limits of
               cleaning, test trenching, and geophysics reveal the   any single method. (3) Archaeological: the investi-
               genesis, composition, preservation, and age of fea-  gated part of the Karst emerges as a complex pal-
               tures, while reducing the problem of equifinality, in   impsest, where prehistoric landscape  structures,
               which similar forms can be produced by different     cairns, walls, and agrarian layouts, are still remark-
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87