Page 91 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 12(2) (2024)
P. 91

by myriads of angels arranged in crowns. At its   siderations of post-Byzantine art within the con-
               summit, the Lamb of God carries the standard   text of its theological significance.
                                15
               of the Resurrection’  (Ferranti 2015, 25).      Jacques Lacarrière (1925–2005) articulat-
                   These instances exemplify a significant shift   ed a transformative understanding of Byzan-
               in scholarly perspectives. The mid-19th century   tine art in his renowned work L’Eté grec. He ac-
               marked the inception of a structured discourse   knowledged ‘to have truly felt the meaning and
               surrounding Byzantine art in France. Scholars   the life of this art only during his final visit.’
               began to engage with frescoes from a predomi-  Lacarrière’s reflections suggest an initiatory ex-
               nantly technical standpoint, culminating in in-  perience, as he admitted that his previous igno-
               fluential works such as the Guide to Painting by   rance ‘about Orthodox hagiography, Byzantine
               Didron, which referenced the painter Denys de   history, painting techniques’ made him ‘experi-
               Fourna. This trajectory ultimately led to Charles   ence a sort of dizziness at the sight of these hun-
               Diehl’s publication  Manual of Byzantine Art   dreds of saints, anchorites, bishops, of martyrs   91
               (Diehl 1910) and Gabriel Millet’s Researches on   populating the walls of Athos.’ His avant-garde
               the Iconography of the Gospel (Millet 1916). Ben-  approach, which prioritized meaning, appeared
               edictine Abbot and musicologist Neyrat (1825–
               1913) noted the intrinsic merit of the frescoes, as-  to diverge from the aesthetic emphasis of Jean
               serting that ‘the figures possess a very great and   Blot;  instead,  Lacarrière  deems  that  ‘frescoes
               noble character.’ Nevertheless, he felt compelled   and icons’ respond ‘to a double function, narra-
               to draw parallels with ‘the ancient frescoes of   tive and aretological: showing the history of the
               Orcagna and Giotto, and occasionally with se-  world according to tradition of the unction Or-
                                       16
               lect works of Albert Dürer’  (Neyrat 1884, 99).   thodox East and demonstrate, by recounting the
               This reference to Western art highlights a criti-  lives, deeds, miracles and martyrdoms of these
               cal juncture in which the engagement with other   exemplary figures, the permanence of their faith,
                                                                                            17
               cultures was often framed within a comparative   and the transcendence of profane time’  (Lacar-
               context that frequently undermined the value of   rière 1975, 83).
               the encountered civilizations.                  Jean Biès (1933–2014) followed in Lacar-    Perceptions of a ‘Journey to the Past’ in Some Viatical Stories at Mount Athos
                   Literate travellers of the 20th century, such   rière’s footsteps along this initiatory journey.
               as Jean Blot, often rejected the fresco-monks’ in-  The revised and corrected edition of his semi-
               clination to refresh their paintings. This rejec-  nal work (1963), published in 1997, introduced
               tion stemmed from a belief that such practices   a  sub-chapter  entitled  ‘Theology  of the  Icon,’
               did not align with their Western bourgeois val-  which echoed Lacarrière’s insights: ‘This formu-
               ues, which elevate the artist to a pedestal and dis-  la pre-existed in the 1963 edition … (Biès 1963,
                                                                                        18
               miss art characterized by naivety and anonymi-  69) and ‘there is not only an aesthetic of the icon;
               ty. This art, inherently didactic, is distinguished   17   ‘trop  de  choses  sur  l’hagiographie  orthodoxe,  l’histoire
               by its humility and popularity. In contemporary   byzantine, les techniques de la peinture » lui fit « éprou-
               society, particularly in the second decade of the   ver une sorte de vertige à la vue de ces centaines de saints,
               21st century, Ferrante Ferranti has revitalized   d’anachorètes,  d’évêques,  de  martyrs  peuplant  les  murs
                                                               de l’Athos [...] d’importance secondaire’, valorisant les
               these discussions by reframing the aesthetic con-  ‘fresques et les icônes’ dans une perspective répondant ‘à
                                                               une double fonction, narrative et arétologique : montrer
               15   ‘...une colline est portée entre le trône de Gloire ou siege   l’histoire du monde selon la tradition de l’Orient ortho-
                   Dieu le Père et les ruines d’une cité , par des myriades d’an-  doxe et démontrer, en racontant la vie, les actes, les mir-
                   ges disposés en couronnes. À son sommet, l’agneau de Dieu   acles et les martyres de ces figures exemplaires, la perma-
                   porte l’étendard de la Résurrection.’       nence de leur foi, l’abolition du temps profane.’
               16   ‘...les figures ont un très grand et très noble caractère.[...]   18   But  the  word  ‘philosophie’  (philosophy)  was
                   aux anciennes fresques d’Orcagna et du Giotto, parfois à   used at that time, instead of ‘theologie’ (theol-
                   certaines têtes d’Albert Dürer.’            ogy).
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96