Page 12 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(2) (2025)
P. 12
dostopna arheologija med otokom in oblakom«, search’, summarizes the results of decades of re-
ki obravnava razkorak med izjemno arheološko search in the Osor aquatorium. By linking older
vrednostjo Osorja in njegovo omejeno sodob- and more recent research, the article emphasiz-
no dostopnostjo. S poudarkom na digitalnih de- es the importance of the marine environment
diščinskih orodjih, zlasti konceptu digitalnega for understanding the continuity of settlement,
dvojnika, članek dostopnost razume kot večdi- maritime activities, and everyday life in Osor
menzionalen dediščinski izziv ter Osor predstavi from antiquity to the modern era.
kot pilotni primer trajnostnega in vključujočega The thematic issue is rounded off by Zrin-
upravljanja dediščine na majhnih ter oddaljenih ka Mileusnić’s contribution ‘Make Osor Great
najdiščih. Again: Accessible Archaeology Between Island
Zbrane razprave ne stremijo k dokončni sin- and Cloud’, which addresses the gap between
tezi zgodovinskih sprememb Osorja, temveč od- Osor’s exceptional archaeological value and its
12 pirajo številna nova raziskovalna vprašanja in limited contemporary accessibility. With an em-
perspektive. Zahvala gre vsem raziskovalcem, ki phasis on digital heritage tools, particularly the
so prispevali k soustvarjanju te tematske števil- concept of digital twins, the article understands
studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 13 (2025), številka 2 / volume 13 (2025), number 2
ke in potrdili pomen kritičnega dialoga. Takšno accessibility as a multidimensional heritage chal-
razumevanje Osorja kot zgodovinskega palimp- lenge and presents Osor as a pilot case of sustain-
sesta, podprto s transdisciplinarnimi interpre- able and inclusive heritage management at small
tacijami, presega dihotomijo med zgodovino in and remote sites.
mitom ter Osor potrjuje kot trajno odprt pros- The collected discussions do not aim to
tor, kjer se preteklost, pokrajina, človek in do- provide a definitive synthesis of the historical
mišljija srečujejo v kontinuiranem ustvarjanju changes in Osor, but rather open up numerous
pomena. new research questions and perspectives. Thanks
go to all the researchers who contributed to the
creation of this thematic issue and confirmed
the importance of critical dialogue. This un-
derstanding of Osor as a historical palimpsest,
supported by transdisciplinary interpretations,
transcends the dichotomy between history and
myth and confirms Osor as a permanently open
space where the past, landscape, people, and im-
agination meet in the continuous creation of
meaning.

