Page 157 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(2) (2025)
P. 157

tivities for valorisation, as well as their participa-  tion aligns directly with the need to overcome
               tion in heritage management (Cindrić 2021, 67).   insularity through mediated forms of access.
               The Croatian Tourism Act (Zakon o turizmu       Cultural heritage governance in Croatia
               2023) and related policy instruments also stress   operates across multiple institutional levels, in-
               the importance of destination management and   volving the Ministry of Culture and Media, re-
               stakeholder coordination, suggesting integrated   gional conservation offices, museums, and local
               planning between tourism boards, municipal-  authorities. In Osor, this governance structure
               ities, cultural institutions, and civil society. In   intersects with tourism institutions such as the
               this sense, Osor’s heritage cannot be treated in   Mali Lošinj Tourist Board and regional destina-
               isolation but must be a part of coordinated gov-  tion management bodies. While this multi-level
               ernance structures that align tourism promotion   system provides legal protection for monuments
               with heritage conservation and dissemination of   and archaeological sites, it can also lead to frag-
               scientific research results.                mentation in interpretation and promotion. The   157
                   At the regional scale, the Tourism Devel-  challenge is in bridging the heritage protection
               opment Strategy for Cres and Lošinj (Horwath   and tourism use. Archaeological sites are sub-
               HTL 2021) articulates a vision of the archipel-  ject to strict conservation rules, which can lim-
               ago as a sustainable, high-quality destination   it physical access and development. On the oth-
               rooted in nature, health tourism, and cultural   er hand, tourism seeks visibility, narrative, and
               identity The document highlights the need to   visitor engagement. Digital heritage tools offer a
               reduce  seasonality,  strengthen thematic  prod-  mediating layer between these elements by ena-
               ucts, and improve the interpretation of cultural   bling interpretation without physical interven-
               resources (Čorak 2013, 22; Rudančić and Ćućić   tion in sensitive areas. The integration of digi-
               2019, 7–8; Nikolić 2021, 31). Within this, Osor   tal strategies into tourism governance would be
               has a role as a historical and archaeological point   a technical innovation but also an institution-
               and not a resort-oriented settlement. Its poten-  al one, as it requires shared data infrastructures,
               tial is in complementing beach destinations   collaborative content production, and long-term
               through heritage-based experiences. The strat-  maintenance commitments. We must warn that
               egy recognises the importance of small towns   Osor’s development as a digitally accessible her- Make Osor Great Again: Accessible Archaeology Between Island and Cloud
               and villages as carriers of authenticity and local   itage site depends as much on governance capac-
               character, suggesting that targeted investment   ity as on technological feasibility.
               in interpretation and infrastructure can gener-  The Osor Musical Evenings represent a key
               ate added value without large-scale physical de-  contemporary practice through which Osor’s
               velopment. Efforts in Mali Lošinj demonstrate   heritage is reactivated and reinterpreted. By sit-
               how sustainability can be translated into tangi-  uating classical music performances within spac-
               ble advantages, including preserving the envi-  es, the festival shows possibilities for the adap-
               ronment, fostering the local economy, and safe-  tive reuse of archaeologically and historically
               guarding cultural identity, despite challenges   significant structures. In this context, music op-
               like pronounced seasonality. Regional planning   erates as an intangible heritage practice that an-
               documents further emphasise the role of digital   imates material remains, producing meanings
               technologies in destination branding and visi-  that extend beyond scholarly interpretation and
               tor engagement. Digital platforms are identified   embed archaeology within lived, ritualised ex-
               as tools for storytelling, itinerary planning, and   perience (Pleše 2024, 31). Despite its strong cul-
               educational outreach, enabling destinations to   tural and symbolic impact, the festival remains
               communicate complex narratives and to reach   concentrated in the summer season, reflecting
               audiences beyond those physically present   broader Adriatic tourism patterns and limiting
               (Floričić et al. 2023, 73). For Osor, this orienta-  its contribution to sustainable heritage manage-
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162