Page 36 - Kutnar, Andreja, et al., eds., 2015. Proceedings of the 1st COST Action FP1307 International Conference - Life Cycle Assessment, EPDs, and modified wood. University of Primorska Press, Koper.
P. 36
e
 cycle
 impacts
 of
 modified
 wood
 products
 

Lauri
 Linkosalmi1,
 Kristiina
 Laine2,
 Lauri
 Rautkari3
 

1
 Aalto
 University,
 School
 of
 Chemical
 Technology,
 Department
 of
 Forest
 Products
 
Technology,
 Vuorimiehentie
 1,
 FI-­‐02150
 Espoo,
 Finland,
 lauri.linkosalmi@aalto.fi
 
2
 KTH
 -­‐
 Royal
 Institute
 of
 Technology,
 Department
 of
 Civil
 and
 Architectural
 Engineering,
 
Division
 of
 Building
 Materials,
 Brinellvägen
 23,
 100
 44
 Stockholm,
 Sweden,
 
kristiina.laine@byv.kth.se
 
3
 Aalto
 University,
 School
 of
 Chemical
 Technology,
 Department
 of
 Forest
 Products
 
Technology,
 Vuorimiehentie
 1,
 FI-­‐02150
 Espoo,
 Finland,
 lauri.rautkari@aalto.fi
 


 

Keywords:
 heat
 treatment,
 life
 cycle
 assessment,
 sawn
 timber,
 thermal
 modification
 


 

Wood
 is
 widely
 utilised
 in
 the
 built
 environment
 as
 structural
 and
 non-­‐structural
 elements.
 Wood
 
has
  excellent
  properties
  as
  a
  building
  material,
  however,
  some
  wood
  properties
  (dimensional
 
stability,
  strength,
  and
  biological
  durability)
  are
  influenced
  by
  the
  surrounding
  moisture
 
conditions,
 which
 may
 reduce
 the
 service
 life
 and
 increase
 the
 need
 for
 maintenance.
 In
 order
 to
 
control
  the
  interaction
  of
  wood
  and
  moisture,
  different
  wood
  modification
  methods
  have
  been
 
developed,
 thermal
 modification
 (also
 termed
 heat
 treatment)
 being
 the
 most
 widely
 spread
 and
 
commercially
 utilised
 process.
 
Life
 cycle
 assessment
 is
 a
 coherent
 tool
 to
 identify
 environmental
 impacts
 through
 the
 whole
 life
 
cycle
  of
  different
  products
  and
  can
  be
  observed
  in
  three
  aspects:
  economic,
  environmental,
  and
 
social.
 From
 the
 economic
 view
 point
 thermally
 modified
 wood
 may
 be
 more
 expensive
 compared
 
to
  non-­‐modified
  timber
  due
  to
  increased
  processing
  and
  improved
  performance
  suited
  for
  a
 
certain
  purpose.
  Environmental
  impacts
  may
  be
  greater
  in
  the
  manufacturing
  phase,
  however,
 
the
  life
  cycle
  is
  expected
  to
  become
  longer
  and
  the
  need
  for
  maintenance
  is
  reduced
  due
  to
  the
 
improved
 durability.
 The
 utilisation
 and/or
 production
 of
 toxic
 or
 harmful
 chemical
 compounds
 in
 
the
  modification
  process
  should
  be
  avoided,
  which
  is
  not
  a
  problem
  with
  thermally
  modified
 
wood
  as
  only
  heat
  and
  water
  vapour
  are
  added.
  However,
  some
  extractives
  are
  released
  during
 
the
  modification
  process
  and
  may
  cause
  an
  increase
  of
  some
  environmental
  indicators.
 
  The
 
recyclability
 of
 thermally
 modified
 wood
 should
 also
 be
 considered
 as
 one
 of
 the
 main
 factors
 and
 
it
  is
  expected
  to
  be
  similar
  to
  non-­‐modified
  timber,
  but
  the
  main
  difficulty
  in
  the
  recyclability
  of
 
wood-­‐based
  products
  are
  surface
  treatments,
  which
  include
  resins
  and
  metal
  fasteners
  that
  are
 
often
 used
 in
 building.
 In
 order
 to
 make
 a
 meaningful
 analysis,
 the
 system
 boundary
 for
 modified
 
wood
 products
 should
 always
 be
 the
 entire
 life
 cycle.
 
 


  24
 
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41