Page 33 - Kutnar, Andreja, et al., eds., 2015. Proceedings of the 1st COST Action FP1307 International Conference - Life Cycle Assessment, EPDs, and modified wood. University of Primorska Press, Koper.
P. 33
le
1:
L ife
cycle
inventory
for
33,3
m²
of
ThermoVacuum,
untreated,
and
preserved
cladding.
ThVacuum
Untreat.
Preserv.
from
Nature
Water
kg
51,3
from
Sawn
wood,
softwood,
raw,
kiln
dried
m³
1,44
Sawn
wood,
softwood,
planed,
kiln
m³
3
1
Technosph.
dElreiecdtr
icity,
low
voltage
{FR}
kWh
25
3
Transport,
freight,
lorry
16-‐32
metric
tkm
1152
67
67
Ptolann
ing
m³
1,30
Wood
preservative,
organic
salt,
Cr-‐ kg
10
E
mission
to
air
Wfreaet e
r
kg
46
10
substances
kg
9,8
W
aste
Waste
water
treatment
kg
25
Landfill
of
biodegradable
waste
(tar)
g
48
treatment
Waste
incineration
of
untreated
kg
605
135
0
45
0
Life
cycle
impact
aswseososdm
ent
The
impact
assessment
was
performed
with
the
ReCiPe
v1.12
methodology
processed
by
SimaPro
8.0.5.
The
results
were
normalized
to
compare
the
environmental
impact
of
the
representative
surface
cladding
to
the
European
reference
impact.
Figure
1
shows
Untreated
cladding
dominates
Ecosystems,
the
principal
damage
category,
due
to
the
impact
of
agricultural
land
use,
because
it
uses
3
times
the
amount
of
wood
than
others
claddings.
Untreated
cladding
has
a
negative
impact
on
Human
Health
and
Resources
through
the
recovery
of
energy
and
the
avoided
use
of
fossil
resources
on
Fossil
depletion
and
Climate
change
impacts.
ThermoVacuum
cladding
damage
categories
are
better
than
preserved
claddings
especially
to
human
health.
0.6
0.5
Thermovacuum
0.4
Untreated
0.3
Preserved
0.2
0.1
0.0
-‐0.1
Human
Health
Ecosystems
Resources
Method:
ReCiPe
Endpoint
(H)
V1.12
/
Europe
ReCiPe
H/A
/
Normalisa•on
Figure
1:
Damage
category
of
ThermoVacuum,
untreated
and
preserved
cladding.
References
Allegretti
O.,
Brunetti
M.,
Cuccui
I.,
Ferrari
S.,
Nocetti
M.,
Terziev
N.,
2012.
Thermo-‐vacuum
modification
of
spruce
(Picea
abies
Karst.)
and
fir
(Abies
alba
Mill.)
wood.
BioResources,
7,
pp.
3656–3669.
Ferreira
J.,
Esteves
B.,
Nunes
L.,
Domingos
I.,
2014
Life
cycle
assessment
of
thermally
treated
and
untreated
maritime
pine
boards:
a
Portuguese
case
study.
7th
European
Conference
on
Wood
Modification.
Lisbon.
Acknowledgments
Work
co-‐founded
by
Eco-‐Innovation
Initiative
of
the
European
Union,
project
ref.
TV4NEWOOD,
Eco/12/333079
21
1:
L ife
cycle
inventory
for
33,3
m²
of
ThermoVacuum,
untreated,
and
preserved
cladding.
ThVacuum
Untreat.
Preserv.
from
Nature
Water
kg
51,3
from
Sawn
wood,
softwood,
raw,
kiln
dried
m³
1,44
Sawn
wood,
softwood,
planed,
kiln
m³
3
1
Technosph.
dElreiecdtr
icity,
low
voltage
{FR}
kWh
25
3
Transport,
freight,
lorry
16-‐32
metric
tkm
1152
67
67
Ptolann
ing
m³
1,30
Wood
preservative,
organic
salt,
Cr-‐ kg
10
E
mission
to
air
Wfreaet e
r
kg
46
10
substances
kg
9,8
W
aste
Waste
water
treatment
kg
25
Landfill
of
biodegradable
waste
(tar)
g
48
treatment
Waste
incineration
of
untreated
kg
605
135
0
45
0
Life
cycle
impact
aswseososdm
ent
The
impact
assessment
was
performed
with
the
ReCiPe
v1.12
methodology
processed
by
SimaPro
8.0.5.
The
results
were
normalized
to
compare
the
environmental
impact
of
the
representative
surface
cladding
to
the
European
reference
impact.
Figure
1
shows
Untreated
cladding
dominates
Ecosystems,
the
principal
damage
category,
due
to
the
impact
of
agricultural
land
use,
because
it
uses
3
times
the
amount
of
wood
than
others
claddings.
Untreated
cladding
has
a
negative
impact
on
Human
Health
and
Resources
through
the
recovery
of
energy
and
the
avoided
use
of
fossil
resources
on
Fossil
depletion
and
Climate
change
impacts.
ThermoVacuum
cladding
damage
categories
are
better
than
preserved
claddings
especially
to
human
health.
0.6
0.5
Thermovacuum
0.4
Untreated
0.3
Preserved
0.2
0.1
0.0
-‐0.1
Human
Health
Ecosystems
Resources
Method:
ReCiPe
Endpoint
(H)
V1.12
/
Europe
ReCiPe
H/A
/
Normalisa•on
Figure
1:
Damage
category
of
ThermoVacuum,
untreated
and
preserved
cladding.
References
Allegretti
O.,
Brunetti
M.,
Cuccui
I.,
Ferrari
S.,
Nocetti
M.,
Terziev
N.,
2012.
Thermo-‐vacuum
modification
of
spruce
(Picea
abies
Karst.)
and
fir
(Abies
alba
Mill.)
wood.
BioResources,
7,
pp.
3656–3669.
Ferreira
J.,
Esteves
B.,
Nunes
L.,
Domingos
I.,
2014
Life
cycle
assessment
of
thermally
treated
and
untreated
maritime
pine
boards:
a
Portuguese
case
study.
7th
European
Conference
on
Wood
Modification.
Lisbon.
Acknowledgments
Work
co-‐founded
by
Eco-‐Innovation
Initiative
of
the
European
Union,
project
ref.
TV4NEWOOD,
Eco/12/333079
21
