Page 133 - Rižnar, Igor, and Klemen Kavčič (ed.). 2017. Connecting Higher Education Institutions with Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Koper: University of Primorska Press
P. 133
Intellectual Capital Report of the University

Table 7.2 Continued from the previous page

International and inter-university collaboration

 n f i Home and foreign universities, institutes and research organisations
that have cooperation agreements with the u p

 n fi The number and type of common programmes with other universities
 n f i by degrees of study
 f i
 n f i The number and type of common research projects and programmes
with other universities, institutes, research organisations
 n f i
The resources acquired from the European projects and programmes
 n f i by the university members

The number of students of the u p who fulfil some of their graduation
requirements at other home universities/independent higher educa-
tion institutions – by degrees of study

The number of students from other home universities/independent
higher education institutions who fulfil some of their graduation re-
quirements at our institution – the u p (by degrees of study)

The number of students at the u p who fulfil some of their graduation
requirements in a foreign country

 n f i The number of foreign students who study at the members of the u p
 n f i The number of foreign citizens among the graduates of the u p

 n f i The number of foreign visiting scholars who are involved in the teach-
 n f i ing at the u p
 n f i
 n f i The number of the teaching faculty from a higher education institu-
tion who are involved in teaching at foreign universities as visiting
scholars

The number of foreign visiting researchers and faculty assistants who
are involved in the research process at the higher education institu-
tion and are not involved in teaching

The number of researchers and faculty assistants who are involved in
the research process at a higher education or research institution in a
foreign country and are not involved in teaching

op ombe f i – financial indicator, n f i – non-financial indicator.

other forms of obligatory reporting, it merely complements them. We
are of the opinion that the research results show that the introduction
of such a method of reporting is sensible. At the same time, by designing
the ic measurement and disclosure model at the university, we reply
positively to our research question.

The research presents the first attempt of this kind in the Slovenian
higher education area. Our aim is to contribute to an in-depth under-
standing of the significance of ic for the university and spur further
activities in designing the model for ic disclosure and management.

131
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138