Page 141 - Kukanja Gabrijelčič, Mojca, and Maruška Seničar Željeznov, eds. 2018. Teaching Gifted and Talented Children in A New Educational Era. Koper: University of Primorska Press.
P. 141
How Kindergarten Teachers Perceive Giftedness

Table 4 Importance of Identifying Potential Gifted Preschool Children

Country Yes No Total
f
f f% f f%  f%
 .
Croatia  .  .  .
.
Slovenia  .  .

Total  .  .

– The percentage of Generation X members taking the intellectual ap-
proach is higher than other generations (the difference is particularly
marked between Generation X and Generation Y);

– The percentage of Baby Boomers taking the qualitative approach is
higher than other generations (the difference is particularly marked be-
tween the Baby Boom generation and Generation Y).

Croatia:

– The percentage of Generation X members taking the ‘not labelling’ ap-
proach is higher than other generations (the difference is particularly
marked between Generation X and Generation Y, none of whom take
the ‘not labelling’ approach);

– The percentage of Baby Boomers taking the egalitarian approach is
higher than other generations (the difference is particularly marked be-
tween the Baby Boom generation and Generation X);

– The percentage of Generation X members taking the holistic approach
is higher than other generations (the difference is particularly marked
between Generation X and Generation Y);

– No members of Generation X take the intellectual approach;
– The percentage of Generation Y members taking the qualitative ap-

proach is higher than other generations.

The results do not allow us to outline any joint characteristics within spe-
cific generations, either within the two countries as taken together or within
the countries themselves.

Identification of Potentially Gifted Preschool Children. Identifying potentially
gifted preschool children was important to 82.99 of respondents (and
therefore not important to 17.01 of respondents). A comparative analy-
sis of the two countries shows that 95.7 of Croatian respondents and 75
of Slovenian respondents regarded identification as important (i.e. 25 of
Slovenian respondents did not regard it as important). The differences in

139
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146