Page 11 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(1) (2025)

in selekcije, vpisane v razvoj. Besedilo inteli- gies. Tadej Praprotnik analyses the metaphors of
gentno razstavi, kako metafore sooblikujejo ‘big data’ and ‘artificial intelligence’ as tools of
meje možnega, verjetnega in legitimnega v teh- naturalisation: when we talk about data flows,
noloških imaginarijih. clouds, or tsunamis, we are not only describing
Številko sklenemo z dvema recenzijama, the world, but also staging it and obscuring the
ki sta tudi most med znanstvenimi polji in kul- choices, interests, and selections embedded in
turnim spominom. Tomaž Pisanski v bran- its development. The text intelligently demon-
ju Osetove korespondence z Josipom Plemljem strates how metaphors help shape the bounda-
razpre ne le osebnost velikega matematika, tem- ries of what is possible, probable, and legitimate
več tudi medij, v katerem se znanost kot skup- in technological imaginaries.
nost gradi – pismo. Njegov esej z natančnim We conclude the issue with two reviews that
zgodovinskim posluhom prestreže, kako se also serve as a bridge between scientific fields and
anekdote, časopisni odmevi in arhivi pretvarja- cultural memory. In his reading of Oset’s cor-
jo v biografsko vednost. respondence with Josip Plemelj, Tomaž Pisan- 11
Jonatan Vinkler pa nas v recenziji monu- ski reveals not only the personality of the great
mentalne monografije o Janu Žižki opozori, da mathematician, but also the medium in which
je tudi knjiga kot predmet epistemološki dogo- science as a community is built – the letter. His
dek: tipografija, likovna celota in uredniška od- essay, with its keen historical ear, captures how uvodnik • editorial
ličnost niso zgolj embalaža, temveč del zgodbe, anecdotes, newspaper reports, and archives are
ki jo zgodovinopisje pripoveduje o sebi. transformed into biographical knowledge.
Če bi skušali duh te številke ujeti v en stavek, In his review of a monumental book on Jan
bi rekli: Znanje je razmerje – med površino in Žižka, Jonatan Vinkler reminds us that a book
globino, med zvokom slogana in tišino arhiva, as an object is also an epistemological event: ty-
med ploskvijo karte protestov in reliefom gomil pography, visual design, and editorial excellence
na Krasu, med liturgično podobo in vonjem po are not merely packaging, but part of the story
dimu, med metaforo in proceduro. V času, ko se that historiography tells about itself.
pospešuje tako raziskovanje kot sodbe o razisk- If we were to try to capture the spirit of this
ovanju, ostaja naša naloga dvojna: povečevati os- issue in a single sentence, we would say: knowl-
trino metod in širiti občutljivost za pomen. edge is a relationship – between surface and
Vsem avtoricam in avtorjem se zahvaljujem depth, between the sound of a slogan and the
za zaupanje ter potrpežljivost pri uredniškem silence of an archive, between the flatness of a
postopku. Bralce pa vabim, da pri vsakem prispe- map of protests and the relief of mounds in the
vku poskusijo storiti še en korak čez prag, iz svo- Karst, between a liturgical image and the smell
je cone domačnosti na dvorišče druge metode, of smoke, between metaphor and procedure. At
drugega jezika ali drugega čuta. Verjamem, da a time when both research and judgments about
vas bo številka 2025/1 nagradila z novimi potmi research are accelerating, our task remains two-
med disciplinami in z ostrim pogledom na svet, fold: to increase the sharpness of our methods
ki ga skupaj soustvarjamo. and to broaden our sensitivity to meaning.
I want to thank all the authors for their
trust and patience throughout the editorial pro-
cess. I invite readers to take another step across
the threshold with each contribution, from their
zone of familiarity into the courtyard of anoth-
er method, another language, or another sense.
Issue 2025/1 will reward you with new paths be-
tween disciplines and a sharp view of the world
we are co-creating.