Page 99 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 13(1) (2025)
P. 99

Impact of Global Imperial Designs on    utes to a deeper understanding of how contract
                   Africa.’ Australasian Review of African   archaeology has evolved in Namibia. The paper of-
                   Studies 33 (2): 48–73.                  fers insights into the challenges and opportunities
               Ndlovu, N. 2014. ‘Contract Archaeology in   associated with integrating cultural heritage pres-
                   South Africa: Some Ethical Concerns.’   ervation into broader development agendas.
                   Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 49
                   (2): 203–217.                           Povzetek
               Rodman, K. A. 1994. ‘Public and Private     Prispevek obravnava razvoj pogodbene arheologi-
                   Sanctions against South Africa.’ Political   je v Namibiji ter sledi njenemu nastanku kot sa-
                   Science Quarterly 109 (2): 313–34.      mostojne discipline znotraj širšega polja arheologi-
               Shepherd, N. 2015. ‘Contract Archaeology in   je in raziskovanja dediščine. Preučuje, kako je bil
                   South Africa: Traveling Theory, Local   razvoj pogodbene arheologije tesno prepleten s po-
                   Memory and Global Designs.’ International   litičnim in z gospodarskim okoljem pred- ter po-
                   Journal of Historical Archaeology 19 (4): 748–  osamosvojitvene  Namibije. Prispevek  posebej  za-  99
                   763.                                    govarja tezo, da je bil vzpon pogodbene arheologije
               South African Heritage Resources Agency. n.d.   v simbiotskem razmerju s politično agendo gos-
                   ‘SAHRA APM Guidelines: Minimum          podarskega razvoja, zlasti preko presoj vplivov na
                   Standards for the Archaeological and    okolje (EIA). Nadalje prispevek poudarja pomen
                   Palaeontological Components of Impact   regulacije in standardizacije prakse pogodbene
                   Assessment.’                            arheologije v Namibiji. Zavzema se za vzpostavi-
                                                           tev in/ali potrditev operativnih smernic ter stan-
               Summary                                     dardnih operativnih postopkov (angl.  standard
               This paper explores the evolution of contract ar-  operating procedure - SOP), da bi zagotovili do-
               chaeology in Namibia, tracing its emergence as   slednost, preglednost in etično ravnanje pri arhe-
               a distinctive discipline within the broader field   oloških projektih. Te smernice so ključne ne le za
               of archaeology and heritage studies. It exam-  varovanje arheoloških virov, temveč tudi za spod- History and Practice of Contract Archaeology in Namibia
               ines how the development of contract archae-  bujanje najboljših praks na področju upravljanja
               ology was intricately linked to the political and   kulturne dediščine v okviru trajnostnega razvoja.
               economic  landscapes of  both pre- and post-in-  S kritičnim pregledom zgodovinskih dokumen-
               dependence Namibia. Specifically, the paper ar-  tov in z analizo politik to raziskovanje prispeva k
               gues that the rise of contract archaeology was   poglobljenemu razumevanju, kako se je pogodbe-
               symbiotically connected to the country’s polit-  no arheološko delo v Namibiji razvijalo. Prispevek
               ical agenda of economic development, particu-  ponuja vpoglede v izzive in priložnosti, povezane z
               larly through environmental impact assessments   vključevanjem varovanja kulturne dediščine v širše
               (EIAs). Furthermore, the paper underscores the   razvojne agende.
               importance of regulating and standardising the
               practice of contract archaeology in Namibia. It
               argues for the establishment of and/or approval
               of operational guidelines and standard operating
               procedures (SOPs) to ensure consistency, trans-
               parency, and ethical conduct across archaeologi-
               cal projects. These guidelines are crucial not only
               for safeguarding archaeological resources but also
               for promoting best practices in cultural heritage
               management within the framework of sustainable
               development.
                   Through a critical review of historical docu-
               ments and policy analyses, this research contrib-
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104