Page 125 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 11(2) (2023)
P. 125

21
               building at Bonifika in 1962,  and was renamed   while for public buildings  – including school
               after the national hero of the partisan movement,   buildings – he drew more directly on contempo-
               Pinko  Tomažič.  Although  the  area  of  drained   rary modernist trends.
               salt pans had started to be reclaimed already un-  It was in the context of school buildings
               der the Kingdom of Italy in the 1920s and 1930s   that a major breakthrough was made in Slove-
               (Čebron Lipovec 2020, 249–251), it did not ac-  nia at the time, as an echo of the development
               tually undergo urbanisation until after it was an-  and modernisation of the teaching process (the
               nexed to Yugoslavia. The plan to develop Bonifi-  need for a less rigid learning space, the limitation
               ka with modern neighbourhoods making up the   of the number of pupils, new teaching methods,
               ‘New Koper’ was prepared by the leading archi-  etc.) (Petelin 2020, 172–173). Changes in the
               tect and urban planner in the region at the time,   field of architecture began to take effect with the
               Edo Mihevc, as part of the Urban Plan for Koper   introduction of a new form of education after a
               in 1961. The latter was part of the larger Region-  new Law on Primary Education was adopted in   125
                                                           1959. It was based on the principles of the Com-
               al Plan for the Slovenian Coast (the area of the
 ti            northern Istrian coast within the Socialist Re-  munist League of Yugoslavia and established
                                                           a balance  between education and upbringing
               public of Slovenia) which was drawn up between
               1959 and 1963. Mihevc developed a distinctive ar-  (Sluga and Jelen Madruša 2006, 10). All school
 ta            ranean architecture’ (Čebron Lipovec 2018, 245–  ernist principles: the basic unit was the class-
                                                           buildings were built according to the same mod-
               chitectural idiom of ‘progressive’ and ‘Mediter-
                                                           room, which was to provide the pupil with suf-
               265) for the newly annexed region, consisting of
                                                           ficient space, and the floor plan of the classroom
               modern architecture with elements inspired by
 di            local, vernacular Mediterranean architecture, es-  should be close to square, adequately lit and have
                                                           large windows; the new floor plans should  be
               pecially from the countryside. Through this lo-
                                                           more varied and allow for a more appropriate
               cally influenced yet modern architectural style,
               he wanted to lay the foundations for modern de-
                                                           than a single storey and have dynamic, asymmet-
               velopment in the newly annexed region, based   school design; the schools should not have more  the primary school in postwar koper/capodistria as a social laboratory
 here          contemporary in their floor plans and furnish-  time it should be organically adapted to region-
                                                           rical compositions; construction should be pos-
               on the qualities of historical and geographi-
                                                           sible using a concrete structure, but at the same
               cal features. The new, modern villa-blocks were
                                                           al specificities; finally, schools should stand in
               ings, while their exteriors bore vivid earthy col-
                                                           parks, in the middle of greenery, in contact with
               ours, accented with tile roofs, vertical windows,
                                                           nature. All these principles can be found in sev-
               wooden shutters, stone details, pergolas and lush
               greenery. The architect wrote that this was in-
                                                                                           22
                                                           ifika. At least four variants were made , propos-
               tended to preserve the ‘visual continuity of the
                   studiauniversitatis
                                                           ing a subdivided construction around a central
               landscape’ (Mihevc 1963, 42). This way, he want-  eral proposed variants for the new school at Bon-
               ed to create at least an external appearance that   pavilion (variant A); an even more subdivided,
               sought continuity with the region’s tradition. In   clustered design of pavilions (variant B); and a
               this gesture we can recognise both a desire to re-  simpler, rectangular pavilion design with a wide
               spect this region, but also a desire to conceal the   atrium (variant C). These three variants, which
               obvious cut in the region’s development and his-  directly mirror the principles of the ‘new school’,
               tory caused by the drastic socio-political revolu-  were presented only in plan form. A fourth var-
               tion and  the change of  population. Neverthe-  iant was developed, representing the realised
               less, the Mediterranean character was mainly   building: an elongated, single-storey pavilion
               achieved in residential and tourist architecture,   building  on  columns,  with  three  connecting
                                                           tracts and two spacious, external staircases.
               21   PAK, 936_2, Osnovna šola Janka Premrla Vojka, Šolska
                   kronika, 1962/63.                       22   PAK, 24.2, OLO Projekti, 377, 5.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130