Page 73 - Blečić Kavur, Martina. Povezanost perspektive / A coherence of perspective. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem, 2015.
P. 73
ule tipa Certosa klasične X i XI varijante zemljo- could be generally added in to this variant of Certosa povezanost ... ■ a coherence ... 73
pisno i kulturno obilježavaju najvećim dijelom zale- type fibula.
đe sjevernojadranskog prostora s kojim se Kvarner, pa Certosa type fibulae of the classic X and XI variants
i Osor, na ovaj način prisnije povezivao. U nešto dru- marked geographically and culturally mostly the north
gačijim okolnostima tradiciju tih uhodanih odnosa i Adriatic hinterland area with which the Kvarner, in-
kulturnih kontakata uzduž Caput Adriae i pripadaju- cluding Osor, was intimately connected. In slightly dif-
ćeg mu zaleđa odrazit će se i pri korištenju fibula tipa ferent circumstances traditions of these established re-
Certosa varijanti XII i VII koje vremenski pripadaju lations and cultural contacts along the Caput Adriae and
mlađem razdoblju, kako ćemo vidjeti, od kraja 4. pa appertaining hinterland will be reflected using a fibulae
sve do 2. st. pr. Kr. of the Certosa variants XII and VII that chronological-
ly belong to a younger period - as we shall see, from the
Fibule tipa Baška end of the 4th up to the 2nd cent. BC.

Posve je drugačija situacija s drugim tipom fibule, s fi- Baška type fibulae
bulom tipa Baška (sl. 25D-27). U odnosu na ostale, re-
lativno je malobrojno zastupljena na području Kvar- It is a quite different situation with the other type of fib-
nera, s nešto izrazitijom prisutnošću na otočnim ula - the fibula of Baška type (Fig. 25D-27). In compar-
nalazištima. Prikupljenim novim podatcima općeni- ison to the others it is relatively sparsely represented in
ta karta njihova rasprostiranja neznatno je nadopu- the Kvarner region but something more numerously
njena, osobito za očekivana nalazišta na području ma- present on the island sites. With collected new data a
tične Liburnije.100 Dosadašnje studije koje su se bavile general map of their distribution was slightly amended,
tom problematikom, a zbog pomanjkanja podataka in particular to the expected finds from the territory of
o okolnostima nalaženja, uglavnom su sve primjerke central Liburnia.100 Previous studies dealing with these
tretirale okvirno i to u širokoj vremenskoj distanci od issues, lacking the information on the circumstances
prijelaza 5. na 4. s trajanjem do u 2. pa čak i 1. st. pr. Kr., of their discoveries, mostly treated all examples rough-
tipološki opredijeljene prema klasifikaciji koju je za ly in a wide chronological framework ranging from the
njih bio predložio Š. Batović.101 transition of the 5th to the 4th up the 2nd and even the 1st
cent. BC. Typologically they were defined according to
the classification proposed by Š. Batović.101

100 Klarin 2000; Brusić 2000; Brusić 2002; Brusić 2005; Glogović 2003; Blečić 100 Klarin 2000; Brusić 2000; Brusić 2002; Brusić 2005; Glogović 2003; Blečić
2007a, 116-117, Fig. 8. 2007a, 116-117, Fig. 8

101 Batović 1973, 121-122; Batović 1974, 189-192, sl. 3; Batović 1976, 44, K. 9; Lo Schi- 101 Batović 1973, 121-122; Batović 1974, 189-192, sl. 3; Batović 1976, 44, K. 9; Lo Schi-
avo 1970, K. 6; Glogović 1989, 31-32; Brusić 2000; Klarin 2000, 34-35; Blečić avo 1970, K. 6; Glogović 1989, 31-32; Brusić 2000; Klarin 2000, 34-35; Blečić
2002, 114-115; Brusić 2005, 10-11. 2002, 114-115; Brusić 2005, 10-11.
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78