Page 94 - Blečić Kavur, Martina. Povezanost perspektive / A coherence of perspective. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem, 2015.
P. 94
ezanost perspektive ■ a coherence of perspective 94 sitelje.159 No, kao i kod Japoda, tako su i u jugoistočno- of other finds, considered for similar bullae from graves
alpskom prostoru male brončane bule takvog tipa bile 2 and 3 in Vičja Luka on the island of Brač.157 It was the
značajne za kraj 5. i prvu polovicu 4. st. pr. Kr., najčeš- bullae that precisely marked the Japodian costume of
će povezivane uz negovski horizont Dolenjske što je the Early Iron Age158 and which were considered as be-
učinjeno i za srodne primjerke iz Istre.160 Njima se, kao ing used as amulets with particularly strong prophylac-
i primjerku iz Osora, ipak najbliže paralele mogu naći tic properties, medicinal and tutelary power for their
u japodskom i viničkom kulturnom prostoru u raspo- holders.159 However in the Japodian territory as well as
nu od 5. do 3. st. pr. Kr. in the south-eastern Alpine area such small bronze bul-
lae of this type were significant for the end of the 5th and
Privjesak u obliku ribljeg repa the first half of the 4th cent. BC usually linked with the
Negova horizon in Dolenjska, as it was done and for
Osorski brončani privjesak u obliku ribljeg repa na- the related examples from Istria.160 They had, as also the
glašeno je uvijenijih repova, velikog središnjeg prstena bulla from Osor, the closest parallels on the Japodian
i trokutasto profiliranog tijela (sl. 35B).161 Privjesci toga and in Vinica cultural area ranging from the 5th to the
tipa obilježili su kulture južno od Alpa,162 na prosto- 3rd cent. BC.
ru golaseške kulture163 i kultura jugoistočnog alpskog
prostora (sl. 36). Na sjevernom Jadranu predstavljaju Pendant in the shape of a fish tail
također izniman nalaz i zasad ih, pored Osora, pozna-
jemo jedino iz Nezakcija.164 Pridružiti im valja i privje- The bronze pendant in the shape of a fish tail from
sak iz japodskog zaleđa, iz nekropole Kompolja.165 Osor has accentuated curled tails, a large central ring
and a triangularly profiled body (Fig. 35B).161 Pendants
Iz dosadašnjih istraživanja saznajemo kako se varijan- of this type were characteristic for the cultures south
te takvih privjesaka nalaze pojedinačno ili u kompletu of the Alps,162 the area of the Golasecca culture163 and
s drugim predmetima. Zbog toga su nam poznati kao the cultures of the south-eastern Alpine area (Fig. 36).
ukrasi na klinei (Hochdorf), na situlama (Este) i cista- In the northern Adriatic the represent an exceptional
discovery and are for now in addition to Osor known
159 Balen-Letunić 2009, 227, 231. 157 Marović, Nikolanci 1969, 50, sl. 3, 5; 6, 2; cf. Glogović 19782, 38; Blečić Kavur
160 Mihovilić 2013, 256. 2010, sl. 171; Blečić Kavur, Pravidur 2012, sl. 12, 7.
161 Glogović 1982, 38, T. 3, 2; Glogović 1989, 35, T. 39, 2; Blečić Kavur 2014a, 34. Ko-
158 Balen-Letunić 2009, 226-227.
rištena je terminologija R. De Marinisa – coda di pesce (De Marinis 2000), koja 159 Balen-Letunić 2009, 227, 231.
tipološki odgovara varijanti B prema T. Warnekeu (Warneke 1999, 96). 160 Mihovilić 2013, 256.
162 Warneke 1999, Abb. 47, B. 161 Glogović 1982, 38, T 3, 2; Glogović 1989, 35, T. 39, 2; Blečić Kavur 2014, 34. Used
163 De Marinis 2000, 387.
164 Mihovilić 1996, T. II, 29. was the terminology of R. De Marinis – coda di pesce (De Marinis 2000) whi-
165 Hiller 1991, 192, Abb. 49K. Grobna cjelina koju navodi G. Hiller nije pouzdana ch typological corresponding with variant B after T. Warneke (Warneke 1999,
niti potvrđena stanjem nalaza u Japodskoj zbirci AMZ, gdje se privjesci toga 96).
tipa nalaze, ali potječu iz nepouzdanih konteksta. 162 Warneke 1999, Abb. 47, B.
163 De Marinis 2000, 387.
alpskom prostoru male brončane bule takvog tipa bile 2 and 3 in Vičja Luka on the island of Brač.157 It was the
značajne za kraj 5. i prvu polovicu 4. st. pr. Kr., najčeš- bullae that precisely marked the Japodian costume of
će povezivane uz negovski horizont Dolenjske što je the Early Iron Age158 and which were considered as be-
učinjeno i za srodne primjerke iz Istre.160 Njima se, kao ing used as amulets with particularly strong prophylac-
i primjerku iz Osora, ipak najbliže paralele mogu naći tic properties, medicinal and tutelary power for their
u japodskom i viničkom kulturnom prostoru u raspo- holders.159 However in the Japodian territory as well as
nu od 5. do 3. st. pr. Kr. in the south-eastern Alpine area such small bronze bul-
lae of this type were significant for the end of the 5th and
Privjesak u obliku ribljeg repa the first half of the 4th cent. BC usually linked with the
Negova horizon in Dolenjska, as it was done and for
Osorski brončani privjesak u obliku ribljeg repa na- the related examples from Istria.160 They had, as also the
glašeno je uvijenijih repova, velikog središnjeg prstena bulla from Osor, the closest parallels on the Japodian
i trokutasto profiliranog tijela (sl. 35B).161 Privjesci toga and in Vinica cultural area ranging from the 5th to the
tipa obilježili su kulture južno od Alpa,162 na prosto- 3rd cent. BC.
ru golaseške kulture163 i kultura jugoistočnog alpskog
prostora (sl. 36). Na sjevernom Jadranu predstavljaju Pendant in the shape of a fish tail
također izniman nalaz i zasad ih, pored Osora, pozna-
jemo jedino iz Nezakcija.164 Pridružiti im valja i privje- The bronze pendant in the shape of a fish tail from
sak iz japodskog zaleđa, iz nekropole Kompolja.165 Osor has accentuated curled tails, a large central ring
and a triangularly profiled body (Fig. 35B).161 Pendants
Iz dosadašnjih istraživanja saznajemo kako se varijan- of this type were characteristic for the cultures south
te takvih privjesaka nalaze pojedinačno ili u kompletu of the Alps,162 the area of the Golasecca culture163 and
s drugim predmetima. Zbog toga su nam poznati kao the cultures of the south-eastern Alpine area (Fig. 36).
ukrasi na klinei (Hochdorf), na situlama (Este) i cista- In the northern Adriatic the represent an exceptional
discovery and are for now in addition to Osor known
159 Balen-Letunić 2009, 227, 231. 157 Marović, Nikolanci 1969, 50, sl. 3, 5; 6, 2; cf. Glogović 19782, 38; Blečić Kavur
160 Mihovilić 2013, 256. 2010, sl. 171; Blečić Kavur, Pravidur 2012, sl. 12, 7.
161 Glogović 1982, 38, T. 3, 2; Glogović 1989, 35, T. 39, 2; Blečić Kavur 2014a, 34. Ko-
158 Balen-Letunić 2009, 226-227.
rištena je terminologija R. De Marinisa – coda di pesce (De Marinis 2000), koja 159 Balen-Letunić 2009, 227, 231.
tipološki odgovara varijanti B prema T. Warnekeu (Warneke 1999, 96). 160 Mihovilić 2013, 256.
162 Warneke 1999, Abb. 47, B. 161 Glogović 1982, 38, T 3, 2; Glogović 1989, 35, T. 39, 2; Blečić Kavur 2014, 34. Used
163 De Marinis 2000, 387.
164 Mihovilić 1996, T. II, 29. was the terminology of R. De Marinis – coda di pesce (De Marinis 2000) whi-
165 Hiller 1991, 192, Abb. 49K. Grobna cjelina koju navodi G. Hiller nije pouzdana ch typological corresponding with variant B after T. Warneke (Warneke 1999,
niti potvrđena stanjem nalaza u Japodskoj zbirci AMZ, gdje se privjesci toga 96).
tipa nalaze, ali potječu iz nepouzdanih konteksta. 162 Warneke 1999, Abb. 47, B.
163 De Marinis 2000, 387.
