Page 102 - Gričar, Sergej, Barbara Rodica and Štefan Bojnec, 2016. Sandwich Management. Koper: University of Primorska Press
P. 102
Sandwich Management
has already hired. The project PKP Sandwich will also be signed up to ten-
der for awards for innovation Chamber of Commerce Dolenjska and Bela
Krajina.
At the end of the project we had social meeting and at this meeting (be-
low), all active members were asked to meet a survey on the topic of project.
Of the nine expected responses we have received eight. Everyone agrees
that would like to work again on the project.
102
Figure 31: Completion of the project at a social gathering
Source: Own source 2014.
The survey involved two males, one person who was not identified and
five females. The average score on the question of efficiency of a project was
3.88, on a scale from 1 to 5, where ‘one’ means that during the project they
did not gain any new knowledge (below average) and ‘five’ means that they
gained exceptional skill (above average).
We have also assessed the other side of the efficiency. Score ‘one’ meant
that it was working with SMEs below expectations and more was expect-
ed. Score ‘five’ meant that the work and mentoring SMEs were exceptional
and that the mentor was always available. The average score was 4.13. In the
next issue of whether the project has real potential for success in the mar-
ket, the respondents responded with an average rating of 3.63. The evalua-
tion assessed that ‘one’ suggested that it is impossible to carry out the pro-
ject in the market under any circumstances, while the score of ‘five’ means
that project is viable and capable of implementation on the market(s).
On the question, whether project has given you long term knowledge
for further studies and work, respondents on average responded with an as-
sessment of 4.0. Here, a score of ‘five’ means that the mentoring was excep-
tional and working mentor was always available. After assessing the teach-
ing mentors, respondents gave an average 3.67 points on a scale of one to
has already hired. The project PKP Sandwich will also be signed up to ten-
der for awards for innovation Chamber of Commerce Dolenjska and Bela
Krajina.
At the end of the project we had social meeting and at this meeting (be-
low), all active members were asked to meet a survey on the topic of project.
Of the nine expected responses we have received eight. Everyone agrees
that would like to work again on the project.
102
Figure 31: Completion of the project at a social gathering
Source: Own source 2014.
The survey involved two males, one person who was not identified and
five females. The average score on the question of efficiency of a project was
3.88, on a scale from 1 to 5, where ‘one’ means that during the project they
did not gain any new knowledge (below average) and ‘five’ means that they
gained exceptional skill (above average).
We have also assessed the other side of the efficiency. Score ‘one’ meant
that it was working with SMEs below expectations and more was expect-
ed. Score ‘five’ meant that the work and mentoring SMEs were exceptional
and that the mentor was always available. The average score was 4.13. In the
next issue of whether the project has real potential for success in the mar-
ket, the respondents responded with an average rating of 3.63. The evalua-
tion assessed that ‘one’ suggested that it is impossible to carry out the pro-
ject in the market under any circumstances, while the score of ‘five’ means
that project is viable and capable of implementation on the market(s).
On the question, whether project has given you long term knowledge
for further studies and work, respondents on average responded with an as-
sessment of 4.0. Here, a score of ‘five’ means that the mentoring was excep-
tional and working mentor was always available. After assessing the teach-
ing mentors, respondents gave an average 3.67 points on a scale of one to
