Page 103 - Gričar, Sergej, Barbara Rodica and Štefan Bojnec, 2016. Sandwich Management. Koper: University of Primorska Press
P. 103
Results of Project 103
five. On the scale ‘five’ means that the teaching mentors helped throughout
the project, sometimes even too much.
Below are more subjective assessments by respondents following a se-
ries of orders on the responses received. The added stamp of receipt on the
answers to the question, »what is your full and general opinion on the
completion of the project.«
11/9/2014 12:50:07: »The project is very sustainable and efficiently ori-
ented. I would like to be part of the next project. Time for a specific task
was very short. Perhaps it would be good to have at the next project specifi-
cally familiar with different time commitments / terms at the outset of the
project. Date of payment is undefined. Some parts are missing in the pro-
ject, for example, management. The project should be more interdiscipli-
nary.«
We believe that we need more similar projects, as this on. This is a good
lesson for us. Staff and students were great. I hope that next project con-
sists of similar. :).«
11/9/2014 13:25:36: »The project was a good one. At the end of the pro-
ject we slightly run out of time. In human resources management, we had a
small problem with one of the participants, but we have successfully solved.
Education, training has been very solid.«
11/9/2014 13:26:58: »New knowledge; work discipline; brainstorm-
ing; We got a late payment of money; a great team; great mentors; new ex-
perience.«
11/9/2014 17:20:16: »7/10. Some of the originally planned tasks were
not done, unfortunately. The project provides many links between SMEs
and universities. Both organizations are delivering much-needed guidance
with a sufficient degree of independence. It is important to mention that
we were all well aware of who was part of the team, and what one should do
(implementation of tasks).«
11/9/2014 17:38:04: »This is a great project. The best thing is team-
work, since I received the new knowledge that has helped me in my inter-
view for student work. Time management was good because students could
themselves rearrange work and we could work on project in free time. The
management staff was super, super mentors and others who were involved
in the project. I also did a good training education within the project, so I
got a lot of useful knowledge. Money was a big incentive for the project, be-
cause we know that we will be rewarded.«
11/10/2014 20:50:16: »The main idea of the project was great. We saw
a similar site and ideas, but I’ve never seen anything like it. I like the idea –
selling sandwiches through the site and home delivery. But what I like the
five. On the scale ‘five’ means that the teaching mentors helped throughout
the project, sometimes even too much.
Below are more subjective assessments by respondents following a se-
ries of orders on the responses received. The added stamp of receipt on the
answers to the question, »what is your full and general opinion on the
completion of the project.«
11/9/2014 12:50:07: »The project is very sustainable and efficiently ori-
ented. I would like to be part of the next project. Time for a specific task
was very short. Perhaps it would be good to have at the next project specifi-
cally familiar with different time commitments / terms at the outset of the
project. Date of payment is undefined. Some parts are missing in the pro-
ject, for example, management. The project should be more interdiscipli-
nary.«
We believe that we need more similar projects, as this on. This is a good
lesson for us. Staff and students were great. I hope that next project con-
sists of similar. :).«
11/9/2014 13:25:36: »The project was a good one. At the end of the pro-
ject we slightly run out of time. In human resources management, we had a
small problem with one of the participants, but we have successfully solved.
Education, training has been very solid.«
11/9/2014 13:26:58: »New knowledge; work discipline; brainstorm-
ing; We got a late payment of money; a great team; great mentors; new ex-
perience.«
11/9/2014 17:20:16: »7/10. Some of the originally planned tasks were
not done, unfortunately. The project provides many links between SMEs
and universities. Both organizations are delivering much-needed guidance
with a sufficient degree of independence. It is important to mention that
we were all well aware of who was part of the team, and what one should do
(implementation of tasks).«
11/9/2014 17:38:04: »This is a great project. The best thing is team-
work, since I received the new knowledge that has helped me in my inter-
view for student work. Time management was good because students could
themselves rearrange work and we could work on project in free time. The
management staff was super, super mentors and others who were involved
in the project. I also did a good training education within the project, so I
got a lot of useful knowledge. Money was a big incentive for the project, be-
cause we know that we will be rewarded.«
11/10/2014 20:50:16: »The main idea of the project was great. We saw
a similar site and ideas, but I’ve never seen anything like it. I like the idea –
selling sandwiches through the site and home delivery. But what I like the
