Page 50 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 11(2) (2023)
P. 50

erned the lives of the inhabitants at that time.   cal change in the dominant ethnic structures.
               She also gives a detailed account of the destruc-  Even if other lines of force ran through this soci-
               tion and atrocities committed during the occu-  ety (social differences, political trajectories), they
               pation of Thesprotia.                       would all have disappeared in favour of a sin-
                   In the villages affected, the memory of these   gle polarity opposing Christians and Muslims,
               violences is vivid and the various generations are   Greeks and Albanians. The burning of the old
               still able to recount them easily and in great de-  village of Sagiada mentioned above is a reveal-
               tail, often revealing the circumstances of the   ing example of this. In local memories, it is the
               murders as well as the identity of the murder-  Muslim inhabitants of the neighbouring village
               ers: “During the war, after the Italian offensive   of Liopsi who are identified as having played an
               but  especially  during  the  German  occupation,   active part in this destruction, rather than just
               the main leaders of the Muslim villages in the re-  the German troops. From then on, they became
        50     gion, former landowners whose advantages had   irreconcilable enemies. A resident of Sagiada re-
               been threatened by the annexation to Greece   members his relations with them, whom he still
               in 1913, carried out atrocities against the Chris-  calls the “Turks”, but also the events surround-  ti
        studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 11 (2023), številka 2 / volume 11 (2023), number 2
               tian population” (interview 1), explains a local   ing the burning of the village (interview 5):
               historian living in Sagiada. Moved by strong-
               er passions and resentment, the other testimo-  Did we have a good relationship with the
               nies describe horrific crimes that are inexcusable   Turks from Liopsi? Relations were very   ta
               in the eyes of those who recount them: “My un-  much like ... enemies. Not with all of them,
               cle was shot dead in front of his house. His body   of course. It was their leaders who were
               was dragged by a horse around the village before   against us. There were a lot of Agas who made
               being thrown into the Kalama” (interview 2 in   life hard for us. But it was during the war that
               Smerto), or “The Muslims raped a young girl in   the relationship deteriorated even more be-  di
               the village and killed her” (interview 3 in Ragio)   cause their leaders sided with the Germans.
               and again “I lost my father at the time. It was a   Of course, we’re not talking about all the in-
               ‘Turk’ called Hassan from the neighbouring vil-  habitants. We can’t say that they were all bad,
               lage who beat him and threw him into the river   but their leaders ... The Germans burnt down
               with his hands tied. His name is now inscribed   the village in 1943 and at that point the Turks
               on the monument in front of the church” (inter-  helped them. They took everything they
               view 4 in Kestrini). These various testimonies   could from our houses. They loaded it onto   here
               clearly reveal the permanence of this memory    the animals. They brought it back to their
               among the inhabitants.                          village. They came up behind the Germans
                   While these various murders are classically   and took everything. We saw them from the
               presented as the result of age-old hatred between   mountains where we had fled. The Turko-
               antagonistic religious communities present in   Chams arrived with the Germans and took
               the region for centuries, various interviews also   everything. Even when the Germans left,
               seem to show the extent to which the Second     they carried weapons and did what they
               World War was a key moment in the polariza-     wanted. They even killed people in Sagiada
               tion of local society, to some extent completing   at the time. But after the German army re-
               the structuring of this society into national com-  treated from Greece, they left too. They no
               munities on the basis of faith-based differences.   longer felt safe. They feared retaliation from
               This period seems to be a kind of culmination of   the Greeks here. On the other hand, you                           studiauniversitatis
               the transition that began at the time of annexa-  can’t say that the partisans [Αντάρτες] of Ser-
               tion by Greece, which led to the gradual trans-  vas didn’t drive them away, so they were right
               formation of social relations but also to a radi-  to be afraid. When there’s hatred, anything
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55