Page 191 - Weiss, Jernej, ur./ed. 2025. Glasbena interpretacija: med umetniškim in znanstvenim┊Music Interpretation: Between the Artistic and the Scientific. Koper/Ljubljana: Založba Univerze na Primorskem in Festival Ljubljana. Studia musicologica Labacensia, 8
P. 191

exploring musicological discourses ...
            sample characteristics, methodologies, and findings—is extracted and cod-

            ed.Statistical techniques are then used to synthesize the extracted data, cal-
            culating overall effect sizes, identifying patterns, and assessing the strength
            of the evidence. Researchers evaluate variability among studies (heteroge-
            neity) and assess potential biases, such as publication bias, to ensure the va-
            lidity of the meta-analysis. The final step involves interpreting the results in
            the context of the research question and existing literature, discussing im-
            plications, limitations, and recommendations for future research.
                 While meta-analysis is traditionally associated with quantitative fields,
            its principles are increasingly applied in humanities disciplines like musi-
            cology to synthesize qualitative findings and explore trends within schol-
            arly literature. 16
                 In musicology, studies often employ diverse theoretical frameworks
                              17
            and methodologies.  A meta-analytical approach allows researchers to in-
            tegrate these varied analyses to understand broader trends and shifts in the
            field.  By examining a large corpus of musicological literature, meta-analy-
                 18
            sis aids in identifying prevalent themes, topics, and areas of emphasis with-
                                      19
            in the discipline over time.  It also evaluates methodological approaches
            by assessing the effectiveness and popularity of different research methods
            used in musicology, highlighting methodological advancements or prefer-
            ences.  The findings from meta-analyses contribute to scholarly discourse
                  20
            by providing evidence-based insights into the evolution of musicological
            thought and practice. 21
                 In this study, meta-analysis is combined with corpus-linguistic meth-
            odology to analyze musicological literature from Slovenian journals. This
            integration offers several advantages. Corpus linguistics provides tools for
            quantifying textual data, allowing statistical analysis of language use, the-
            matic frequency, and stylistic features within the corpus.  The systematic
                                                                 22
            nature of meta-analysis reduces subjective biases, enabling a more objective
            16   Jim Samson, Music in the Balkans (Leiden: Brill, 2013).
            17   Nicholas Cook and Mark Everist, eds., Rethinking Music (Oxford: Oxford Universi-
                 ty Press, 1999).
            18   Raymond Monelle, The Sense of Music: Semiotic Essays (Princeton, New Jersey: Prin-
                 ceton University Press, 2000).
            19   Joseph Kerman, Contemplating Music: Challenges to Musicology (Cambridge, MA:
                 Harvard University Press, 1985).
            20   Marion A. Guck, “Analytical Fictions,” Music Theory Spectrum 16, no. 2 (1994): 217–30.
            21   Leo Treitler, Music and the Historical Imagination (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-
                 versity Press, 1995).
            22   McEnery and Hardie, Corpus Linguistics.


                                                                              191
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196