Page 32 - Management 17 (2)
P. 32
reja Pegan | Soustvarjanje v javnem sektorju

Zealand; Elements in Public and Nonprofit Admini- Meynhardt, T. 2009. »Public Value inside: What Is Pu-
stration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. blic Value Creation?« International Journal of Public
Evropska komisija. 2014. Evropski kodeks dobre prakse Administration 32 (3–4): 192–219.
za partnerstvo v okviru evropskih strukturnih skladov.
Luksemburg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije. Moore, M. H. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Ma-
———. B. l. »Konferenca o prihodnosti Evrope.« nagement in Government. Cambridge, ma: Harvard
https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy University Press.
/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european
-democracy/conference-future-europe_sl. Pollitt, C., in G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Re-
Evropska unija. B. l. Evropska državljanska pobuda. form: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Auste-
https://europa.eu/citizens-initiative/_sl. rity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Faulkner, N., in S. Kaufman. 2017. »Avoiding Theo-
retical Stagnation: A Systematic Review and Fra- Røiseland, A. 2022. »Co-Creating Democratic Legiti-
mework for Measuring Public Value.« Australian macy: Potentials and Pitfalls.« Administration & So-
Journal of Public Administration 77 (1): 69–86. ciety 54 (8): 1493–1515.
Fiedler, K., D. Ložar, M. Primc in K. Babič. 2020. Partici-
pativni proracčun: stanje v Sloveniji; poročilo in smer- Torfing, J., E. Sørensen in A. Røiseland. 2019. »Trans-
nice za razvoj. Uredila K. Babič. Maribor: Združenje forming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-
Center alternativne in avtonomne produkcije, soci- Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways for-
alno podjetje, Društvo Gibanje za dostojno delo in ward.« Administration & Society 51 (5): 795–825.
socialno družbo, Društvo Organizacija za participa-
torno družbo in Zavod za podporo civilnodružbe- Van Gestel, N., M. Kuiper in W. Hendrikx. 2019. »Chan-
nih iniciativ in multikulturno sodelovanje Pekarna ged Roles and Strategies of Professionals in the
Magdalenske mreže. (Co)Production of Public Services.« Administrative
Fledderus, J., T. Brandsen in M. Honingh. 2014. »Re- Sciences 9 (3): 59.
storing Trust Through the Co-Production of Public
Services: A Theoretical Elaboration.« Public Mana- Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers in L. G. Tummers. 2015.
gement Review 16 (3): 424–443. »A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Pro-
Fung, A. 2015. »Putting the Public back into Gover- duction: Embarking on the Social Innovation Jour-
nance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and ney.« Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357.
Its Future.« Public Administration Review 75 (4):
513–522. Vrbek, S. 2020. »Report on the Digital Innovation Prac-
Irvin, R. A., in J. Stansbury. 2004. »Citizen Participa- tice Mysuggestion.gov.si (Predlagam.vladi.si).« V
tion in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?« Co-Production and Co-Governance: Strategic Mana-
Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. gement, Public Value, and Co-Creation in the Renewal
Jukić, T., I. Pluchinotta, R. Hržica in S. Vrbek. 2022. of Public Agencies across Europe, uredila B. Regal in
»Organizational Maturity for Co-Creation: Towards E. Ferlie, 276–311. http://cogov.eu/wp-content
a Multi-Attribute Decision Support Model for Pu- /uploads/2020/10/D2-3.pdf.
blic Organizations.« Government Information Quar-
terly 39 (1): 101623. Williams, B. N., S. C. Kang in J. Johnson. 2016. »(Co)-
Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production:
Public Value Failures in Co-Production Processes.«
Public Management Review 18 (5): 692-717.

70 management 17 (2022) številka 2
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37