Page 76 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 8(2) (2020)
P. 76
from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 8 (2020), številka 2 76Kaiser, M. 2011. “New approaches to exploiting
emerging.pdf film in the foreign language classroom.” L2
Goldman, S., J. Braasch, J. Wiley, A.hereditati Journal, 3: 232-249.
Graesser, and K. Brodowinska. 2012.
“Comprehending and learning from Keengwe, J., and G. Onchwari. 2009.
Internet sources: Processing patterns “Technology and early childhood
of better and poorer learners.” Reading education: A technology integration
Research Quarterly, 47(4): 356‒381. professional development model for
Goulah, J. 2007. “Village voices, global visions: practicing teachers.” Early Childhood
Digital video as a transformative foreign Education Journal, 37(3): 209-218. doi:
language learning tool.” Foreign Language 10.1007/s10643-009-0341-0
Annals, 40: 62‒78.
Grabill, J., and T. Hicks. 2005. “Multiliteracies Kress, G. 2009.” What is a mode?” In The
meet methods: The case for digital writing Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis,
in English education.” English Education, edited by C. Jewitt, 54–67. Abingdon,
37(4): 301‒311. UK: Routledge.
Gui, M., and G. Argentin. 2011. “Digital skills
of internet natives: Different forms of Kress, G.; van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal
digital literacy in a random sample of discourse: the modes and media of
northern Italian high school students.” contemporary communication. London:
New Media & Society, 13(6): 963–980. Arnold.
Hutchison, A., B. Beschorner, and D. Schmidt-
Crawford. 2012. “Exploring the use of Kurniawati, N., E. H. Maolida and, and A. G.
the iPad for literacy learning.” Reading Anjaniputra. 2018. “The Praxis of Digital
Teacher, 66(1): 15‒23. doi:10.1002/ Literacy in the EFL Classroom: Digital
TRTR.01090 Immigrant vs Digital-native Teacher.”
Inoue, H., E. Naito, and M. Koshizuka. 1997. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics,
“Mediacy: what is it?” International 8(1): 28‒37. Doi: 10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11459
Information and Library Review, 29(3/4):
403–413. Lenhart, A., and M. Madden. 2005. “Teen
International Society for Technology in content creators and consumers.” Pew
Education [ISTE]. 2012. ISTE and the Internet & American Life Project.
ISTE Standards. Retrieved from https:// Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/
www.iste.org/standards pdfs/PIP_Teens_Content_Creation.pdf.
Ivala, E., and D. Gachago. 2012. “Social media
for enhancing student engagement: The Leu, D.J., C. K. Kinzer, J.L. Coiro, and
use of Facebook and blogs at a university D. W. Cammack. 2004. “Towards a
of technology.” South African Journal of theory of new literacies emerging from
Higher Education, 26(1): 152–167. http:// the Internet and other information
hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC123970 and communication technologies.” In
Jewitt, C. 2014. “12 Multimodal approaches.” Theoretical models and processes of reading
Interactions, images and texts: A reader in (5th ed.), edited by R.B. Ruddell and
multimodality,11: 127. N.J. Unrau, 1570–1613. Newark, DE:
Kalantzis, M., and B. Cope. 2005. Learning by International Reading Association.
design. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian
Schools Innovation Commission. Leung, L., and P. Lee. 2012 “Impact of Internet
Literacy, Internet Addiction Symptoms,
and Internet Activities on Academic
Performance.” Social Science Computer
Review, 30: 403.

Lopez Islas, J.R. 2013. “Digital literacy and
academic success in online education for
underprivileged communities : the prep@
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81