Page 79 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 8(2) (2020)
P. 79
ia universitatisTroyan, F. 2016. “Learning to mean in Spanish and language learning, edited by S. Dubreil
writing: A case study of a genre-based and S. Thorne, 199–226. Boston: Cengage.
digital and multimodal liter acies in for eign language lear ning: theor ies and application 79 pedagogy for standards-based writing Williams, L., L. B. Abraham, and E. D.
instruction.” Foreign Language Annals, 49: Bostelmann. 2014. “A survey-driven study
317–335. of the use of digital tools for language
learning and teaching.” In Digital literacies
Turner, P.M., and R.S. Carriveau. 2010. Next in foreign and second language education,
generation course redesign. New York: Peter edited by J. P. Guikema and L. Williams,
Lang Publishing. 17–67. San Marcos, TX: Calico
Yi, Y.(2014. “Possibilities and challenges of
UNESCO. 1978. Records of the General multimodal literacy practices in teaching
Conference. 20th Session, Vol. 1. Paris: and learning English as an Additional
UNESCO. Language.” Language and Linguistics
Compass, 8(4): 158‒169.
UNESCO Institute for Information Young, C., and T. V. Rasinski. 2013. “Student-
Technologies in Education. 2011. Digital produced movies as a medium for literacy
Literacy in Education. Policy Brief, development.” Reading Teacher, 66(8):
May 2011. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ 670-675. doi:10.1002/trtr.1175
images/0021/002144/214485e.pdf Zapata, G. 2017. “The role of digital Learning
by Design instructional materials in the
UNESCO Institute for statistics. 2018. development of Spanish heritage learners’
Defining literacy literacy skills.” In Multiliteracies pedagogy
and language learning: Teaching Spanish to
http://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/ heritage speakers, edited by G. Zapata and
sites/2/2018/12/4.6.1_07_4.6-defining- M. Lacorte, 67–106. Cham, Switzerland:
literacy.pdf Palgrave Macmillan.
Zhang, M. 2013. “Supporting middle school
Urbančíková, N., N. Manakova, and G. students’ online reading of scientific
Bielcheva. 2017. “Socio-Economic and resources: moving beyond cursory,
Regional Factors of Digital Literacy fragmented, and opportunistic reading.”
Related to Prosperity.” Quality Innovation Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29:
Prosperity, 21(2): 124‒141. 138‒152.
Valdés, G. 2004. “The teaching of academic
language to minority second language
learners.” In Bakhtinian perspectives on
language, literacy and learning, edited by
A. F. Ball and S. W. Freedman, 66–98.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Walraven, A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and H.P.A.
Boshuizen. 2009. “How students evaluate
information and sources when searching
the World Wide Web for information.”
Computers & Education, 52: 234–246.
Walsh, M. 2008. “Worlds have collided and
modes have merged: classroom evidence of
changed literacy practices.” Literacy, 42(2):
101–108.
Warner, C., and D. Richardson. 2017. “Beyond
participation: Symbolic struggles with(in)
digital social media in the L2 classroom.”
In Engaging the world: Social pedagogies
writing: A case study of a genre-based and S. Thorne, 199–226. Boston: Cengage.
digital and multimodal liter acies in for eign language lear ning: theor ies and application 79 pedagogy for standards-based writing Williams, L., L. B. Abraham, and E. D.
instruction.” Foreign Language Annals, 49: Bostelmann. 2014. “A survey-driven study
317–335. of the use of digital tools for language
learning and teaching.” In Digital literacies
Turner, P.M., and R.S. Carriveau. 2010. Next in foreign and second language education,
generation course redesign. New York: Peter edited by J. P. Guikema and L. Williams,
Lang Publishing. 17–67. San Marcos, TX: Calico
Yi, Y.(2014. “Possibilities and challenges of
UNESCO. 1978. Records of the General multimodal literacy practices in teaching
Conference. 20th Session, Vol. 1. Paris: and learning English as an Additional
UNESCO. Language.” Language and Linguistics
Compass, 8(4): 158‒169.
UNESCO Institute for Information Young, C., and T. V. Rasinski. 2013. “Student-
Technologies in Education. 2011. Digital produced movies as a medium for literacy
Literacy in Education. Policy Brief, development.” Reading Teacher, 66(8):
May 2011. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ 670-675. doi:10.1002/trtr.1175
images/0021/002144/214485e.pdf Zapata, G. 2017. “The role of digital Learning
by Design instructional materials in the
UNESCO Institute for statistics. 2018. development of Spanish heritage learners’
Defining literacy literacy skills.” In Multiliteracies pedagogy
and language learning: Teaching Spanish to
http://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/ heritage speakers, edited by G. Zapata and
sites/2/2018/12/4.6.1_07_4.6-defining- M. Lacorte, 67–106. Cham, Switzerland:
literacy.pdf Palgrave Macmillan.
Zhang, M. 2013. “Supporting middle school
Urbančíková, N., N. Manakova, and G. students’ online reading of scientific
Bielcheva. 2017. “Socio-Economic and resources: moving beyond cursory,
Regional Factors of Digital Literacy fragmented, and opportunistic reading.”
Related to Prosperity.” Quality Innovation Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29:
Prosperity, 21(2): 124‒141. 138‒152.
Valdés, G. 2004. “The teaching of academic
language to minority second language
learners.” In Bakhtinian perspectives on
language, literacy and learning, edited by
A. F. Ball and S. W. Freedman, 66–98.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Walraven, A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and H.P.A.
Boshuizen. 2009. “How students evaluate
information and sources when searching
the World Wide Web for information.”
Computers & Education, 52: 234–246.
Walsh, M. 2008. “Worlds have collided and
modes have merged: classroom evidence of
changed literacy practices.” Literacy, 42(2):
101–108.
Warner, C., and D. Richardson. 2017. “Beyond
participation: Symbolic struggles with(in)
digital social media in the L2 classroom.”
In Engaging the world: Social pedagogies
