Page 36 - Studia Universitatis Hereditati, vol 11(2) (2023)
P. 36

ties a form of ‘protective’ narration of their his-  aware of certain aspects of refugee life beyond
               tory and their past.                        Těchonín.
                                                               The first thing that the Savas photographs
               Back to Těchonín or the Paradox             on refugees reveal is the place of the family in
               of Images?                                  life in exile. Their family photographs immor-
               The ‘Hungarian Greeks’ did not stay in Těchonín   talize the repair of family ties severed by the ex-
               for very long; soon after their arrival, in March   odus, a primary preoccupation of refugees in ex-
               of the following year, they were sent to industri-  ile. In addition to their use as souvenirs of this
               al towns near the German-Polish border (Tsivos   reunion, which can be found today in the photo
               2022, 74). In this way, the barracks, which had   boxes of its members, the family photos served
               (for a short time) also been transformed into a   another purpose: they were both the message
               place of shelter, returned to their original use as   and the herald of this reunion, which their dis-
        36     military barracks.                          patch to the countries of the Eastern Bloc and
                   We have not found photographic record   to Greece heralded. Family  portraits  – well-
               of the  crossing of the ‘Greeks from Hungary’   dressed and carefully presented, prepared to take   ti
        studia universitatis hereditati, letnik 11 (2023), številka 2 / volume 11 (2023), number 2
               to Těchonín, and paradoxical as it may seem,   the photo – were a widespread communication
               among the photographs of Savas, there are no   practice among refugees scattered across differ-
               photographs showing sick people convalescing   ent host countries and those who remained in
               in the barracks. Savas personal photographic ar-  Greece. They are photographs that migrate, mi-  ta
               chive from Těchonín do, in fact, show us a life   grant-photographs, in the form of postcards of
               around this place of care, to such an extent that,   families that circulate among refugees. Among
               looking at them, one wonders whether they can   these photographs we find unplanned snapshots,
               be associated with the place where they were tak-  taken at random, but also just the opposite, pho-
               en, since none of the clues, apart from the back-  tographs taken carefully, by people who have   di
               ground showing buildings which, however, bear   taken the time and care to prepare themselves,
               no sign of a health care establishment, or of the   with  a  view  to  being  seen.  In  both  cases,  these
               Red Cross, provide any indication of a specific   photographs convey the message of a reunion
               place, located either in a town or in a city (and   (occasional or permanent) between members of
               therefore in a country). Is it possible, moreover,   the same family in one country, or the fact that
               that these photographs could have been taken   the refugees pictured were living well where they
               not in a convalescent home but in other plac-  were, thanks to their appearance – well-dressed   here
               es,  located  in  the  towns  or  villages where  the   in the host country.
               refugees lived and who, on one occasion or an-  Savas’ photographs on Těchonin also show
               other, found themselves together? Didi Huber-  what would come to characterize the lives of ref-
               man (2003, 49–49) writes about the four pho-  ugees in exile: their proletarianization. Although
               tographs of Auschwitz: ‘The images are nothing   the refugees initially settled in rural areas, most
               but torn shreds, bits of film. They are therefore   of them being of rural origin, the introduction of
               inadequate: what we see [...] is still little com-  heavy industrialization by the countries of East-
               pared to what we know.’                     ern Europe soon transformed this population
                   Savas’ photographs of refugee life in   from farmers into workers.
               Těchonín represent a piece of refugee life in ex-  Finally, the life of the refugees in the coun-
               ile; Looking at these photographs, we realize   tries of Eastern Europe included socialization
               that we do not know who took the photos, who   among themselves, part of which was the crea-                         studiauniversitatis
               the people in the photos are – with a few excep-  tion of musical groups and choirs created by the
               tions – or on what occasion they were taken. Yet,   refugees, which were a way of linking them to-
               despite these  gaps, these  photographs make us   gether. Involving people of all ages, older and
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41